GW-1516 consistency?

[Rawb]

I recently ordered some GW-1516 and it's very thick with an almost slimy texture. Is this how the consistency should be? After having ordered clen/osta I was expecting this to also be a liquid...

 

[tballz]

That's how my GW is.....thicker than the other chems.

 

[Rawb]

Good to know, thanks for the reply

 

[hoochmooch]

Are you aware it causes cancer?

 

[hoochmooch]

New Scientist reported that "tests on rats showed that at all doses, the drug rapidly causes cancers in a multitude of organs, including the liver, bladder, stomach, skin, thyroid, tongue, testes, ovaries and womb."[5] In 2013 WADA took the rare step of warning "cheats" to ensure that there is complete awareness of the possible health risks to athletes who succumb to the temptation of using GW-501516 for performance enhancement. They stated "clinical approval has not, and will not be given for this substance

 

[halfwit]

New Scientist reported that "tests on rats showed that at all doses, the drug rapidly causes cancers in a multitude of organs, including the liver, bladder, stomach, skin, thyroid, tongue, testes, ovaries and womb."[5] In 2013 WADA took the rare step of warning "cheats" to ensure that there is complete awareness of the possible health risks to athletes who succumb to the temptation of using GW-501516 for performance enhancement. They stated "clinical approval has not, and will not be given for this substance

Yet it's being tested for a possible agent in the fight against pancreatic cancer. I hate the medical community sometimes. (Note: The doses on the rats were STARTING at 5mg/kg of body mass. Every cycle I've seen of GW1516 has been 5mg TOTAL. I don't know if this would effect the carcinogenic warnings, but it's something to think about.)

Source: 2009 issue of The Toxicologist. Oxford Journals | Life Sciences & Medicine | Toxicological Sciences

 

[JimiThing]

Yet it's being tested for a possible agent in the fight against pancreatic cancer. I hate the medical community sometimes. (Note: The doses on the rats were STARTING at 5mg/kg of body mass. Every cycle I've seen of GW1516 has been 5mg TOTAL. I don't know if this would effect the carcinogenic warnings, but it's something to think about.)

Source: 2009 issue of The Toxicologist. Oxford Journals | Life Sciences & Medicine | Toxicological Sciences

Exactly! The Human equivalent doses from the study would be approx 450mg /day , 1800mg/day or 3600mg/day. We take what 5-15 mg/day?
What amuses the hell out of me is they use rat studies at what would be ridiculous Human equivalent doses to support the contention when in the very same text there is, as you mentioned, a study on Humans at normal dosages showing it prevents the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Whats wrong with this picture?