Short cycle or long cycle?

[Uk Boy]

Yo peeps waddup?

Anyways it was about that time again and I been reading up on doing short i.e 2-3 weeks max cycles as opposed to the usual 6,8 or 12 weeks plus cycles. The theory is based around the assumption that the body will find it much easier to hold small gains than big gains. Theres a whole scientific explanation behind it all that seems quite feasible. Also it stated that nolva and clomid are not essential when running such short cycles. This also appeals as in the past I have always struggled to hold most of the gains even when using Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), Nolva and Clomid dilligently post cycle.
Right now Im at 210lbs first thing in the morning at about 16% bf. I havent used gear for about eight months and I was 230lbs at the peak of my last cycle which was over 10 weeks.
I gonna give this 3 week cycle a try to see what happens using Test only at around 1500 mgs over the three weeks.

I would appreciate if any guys (or gals for that matter) have tried such a method and what where the results?
Also, what do the veterans think about it and is it also true that the majority of pros nowadays dont use nolva or clomid pct?

Cheers.

 

[solcraft]

bump^^

 

[Perfection Awaits]

Bump.

 

[gareth1978]

I have used such methods before, and got good results, although I prefer 4 weekers now. 1.5g of test is pretty decent amount, have you used this amount before? What was your last cycle? And I assume you're using prop? Nolva or clomid post cycle therapy (pct) is still essential, even with these short cycles... personally I prefer nolva, due to negative sides of clomid.

 

[IronAdonis]

I never heard that I think alot of pros use nolva or clomid. Where did you hear that? What would they use instead if they werent using either of those?

 

[gareth1978]

Well, I said I prefer nolva over clomid... so I do use one of them. Clomid has well documented negative side effects.