Very sorry to hear that man. Nobody likes seeing their child sick.Was up all night with the youngest, shes starting to get sick and when she gets sick it throws her body out of whack and that's when she starts seizures. Staying up watching a sleeping baby all night sucks, I'm so glad I have Netflix
OH yeah! Totally forgot about the fact it gobbles up taurine stores like pac man on crack! Good call brother.Halfwit explained it perfectly (something we're all accustomed to lol). Clen had me out of the gym for 4days bc I wasn't taking enough taurine, electrolytes, and dosed it too high. I was cramping so bad I couldn't do body weight squats.
That's why I switched to letro. Careful though, you are going to want to take baby steps with the stuff or you'll crash your E2 damn quick. RUI's stuff is indeed GTG.I think I'm going to order my gorillas some letro instead of the liquidex I've been giving them.
This is how I keep going broke.
From what I remember, each molecule of any given group of elements is in a constant state of decay. This is the action of it breaking down into each element has a given rate based on the strength of its bonds and type of bonds in use. Think radioactive elements and how they decay into non-radioactive isotopes over a long period of time. As most of the molecules we are using are carbon based, (from what I remember) that's where a lot of it goes - back to carbon and the other base elements over time. I'm sure I'm dumbing it down big time, but that's the gist of what I remember.Here's a question for the big brains.
I know what half life is but what determines the rate of decay of a specific compound?
Molecular weight?
I'm working on trying to find the answer but everyone just wants to define half-life instead :/
Because the enanthate ester has a shorter chain. (slightly)Pretty much, or why does test ethenate decay more quickly than cypionate.
I didn't want to get into specific compounds but more the general concept of what determines rate of decay in a controlled environment.
We're all made of stars.
*edit* WTF I wasted my 1500th post on this!?
That's why I switched to letro. Careful though, you are going to want to take baby steps with the stuff or you'll crash your E2 damn quick. RUI's stuff is indeed GTG.
From what I remember, each molecule of any given group of elements is in a constant state of decay. This is the action of it breaking down into each element has a given rate based on the strength of its bonds and type of bonds in use. Think radioactive elements and how they decay into non-radioactive isotopes over a long period of time. As most of the molecules we are using are carbon based, (from what I remember) that's where a lot of it goes - back to carbon and the other base elements over time. I'm sure I'm dumbing it down big time, but that's the gist of what I remember.![]()
Because the enanthate ester has a shorter chain. (slightly)
Or are stars made of people?
The answer to both is "Yes".
It's just weird to think that every element that comprises everything including the planet itself came from the stars. Does that qualify us as alien?
Rhetorical question:
How does that seemingly random accumulation of space particles orient itself to start firing synapses?
Between all of us, do you think we could successfully resurrect someone?
I've got a car battery and some jumper cables if anyone else wants in.
Cap, I love science and math. Would love to go back and do more in that field but my ex's dad is head of the commodities desk for etrade on wall st. Guy makes 350K before bonuses which are usually at least another 100K. He made me want to switch haha
Between all of us, do you think we could successfully resurrect someone?
I've got a car battery and some jumper cables if anyone else wants in.
Does that qualify anything as alien? If everything is made up of the same elements, nothing is foreign... right?
Does that qualify anything as alien? If everything is made up of the same elements, nothing is foreign... right?
Yes. I'm willing to bet it's already been done.
Deep bruh.
I just love space.
In recent years, scientists began noticing something a little bit off about the structure of the universe. By analyzing the light from distant galaxies, they were able to tell the relative speed and direction in which these objects were moving. The strange thing is that, rather than flying apart like most things in the universe, some of these distant galactic clusters appear to be caught up in a sort of current, speeding at unimaginable velocities (about two million miles per hour) along a specific path. Scientists have coined this phenomenon "dark flow" because, honestly, they really don't know what's causing it. For gravity to be acting on these clusters the way that it seems to be, there would have to be something massive waiting at the end of the path. By massive, we mean something potentially much bigger than anything that we've ever observed in the known universe; something big enough to absolutely dwarf the galactic clusters being sucked towards it like dust to a vacuum cleaner.
Lol why do you think I'm following my dad's footsteps in finance and haven't gone back to school? Money isn't everything, but it's damn near close.
Anything that wasn't in the room when you got there is foreign to you.
But nothing exists until I view it. Everything behind me isn't really there, until I turn around and look at it. So anything not in the room, is nothing... everything is nothing... and nothing cannot be foreign because it does not exist.