IGF1-LR3 sub-Q?

deadbeatrec

mr.anabolic
i have herd from a reputable sorce that when injected IM it breaks down more than sub-Q. what kind of truth to this is there if any?
 
The original source of that info was IBE, when offering a free trial of PegMGF asking that the participants use it sub-q. When asked why the response was "most peptides do better injected sub-q"

So, yea Id like some clarification as well.
 
I've read that it's better to take it IM to the muscle group it was worked immediately PWO to localize growth and better absorption. plus results shouldn't be expected for months as muscle hyperplasia takes time.
 
deadbeatrec said:
i have herd from a reputable sorce that when injected IM it breaks down more than sub-Q. what kind of truth to this is there if any?

I've read the same thing on various boards but, like the rest of you, have never seen any concrete evidence to support it.
 
Back
Top