Machines or Freeweights???

big1now

New member
There's an ongoing battle at the gym that machines are better than the freewheights. Those who use the machines say it is better for form, therefore it benefits muscle growth and definition. Then there are those who say weights, isolates muscles and gives better workout.

What do you think???
 
my $.02
they both work but difference is a machine is better for form and isolation of that muscle group. With free weights you are incorporating more muscle groups. With a free weight you need to use your core body to stablize yourself therefore making it more than just a specific muscle workout. With a machine, it is stablizing for you.
 
I'm pretty sure most people here will vote with free weights.

For the most part, I dislike all machines, but I'll make an exception for some of the Hammer Strength line.

But if you see someone with a great physique, chances are they built it using free weights.
 
string_bean00 said:
I'm pretty sure most people here will vote with free weights.

For the most part, I dislike all machines, but I'll make an exception for some of the Hammer Strength line.

But if you see someone with a great physique, chances are they built it using free weights.
i agree , i do use the cables some for lat pulldowns , tricep pushdowns etc .
 
Sometimes I use machines but there is no way that they will produce greater results than free weights.
 
Freeweights alone are okay. Freeweights as a backbone with some machine use mixed in is okay too. But machine use alone potentially paves the way for joint issues and unecessary injuries. The planes of movement forced by some machines can have directly degradative effects on the joints of certain individuals depending on body proportions. Also, there are small muscle and joint tissues which come into play in the stabilizing of freeweights. Many machines develop the larger muscles while insufficiently training these smaller stabilizers to prepare for the increased abilities of the larger prime movers. That means when you go out into the real world and try to apply your strength in either basic physical labor or your favorite athletic endeavor, machine-trained exclusively gives the potential to either perform far below expectations because the nervous system has limited the firing of your larger muscles due to perceived weakness of the smaller stabilizers or the larger muscles are able to maximally fire and end up effectively overpowering the smaller stabilizers causing injury.

The most well-developed competitive bodybuilders have used freeweights as their mainstay.

For me, I don't really care much for machines other than the Reverse Hyperextension, Cable Rowing variations, Donkey and Seated Calf Raises, Leg Curls, and occasionally Leg Presses and Leg Extensions.
 
Last edited:
machines and free wts. are just tools. its about HOW you use what you use and not about what you use.
p.s. there are no such thing as "stabalizer" muscles. EVERY muscle is a "stabalizer"
 
I don't fit in most machines...

My gym is made up of a power rack and a bench...few bars and lots of plates.

There are a couple that I"d use...after I do the free weight exercise.

B True
 
b fold the truth said:
I don't fit in most machines...

My gym is made up of a power rack and a bench...few bars and lots of plates.

There are a couple that I"d use...after I do the free weight exercise.

B True


haha. you remember a few weeks ago when i had to use machines for presses because i tore my pec? people were laughing at me trying to fit into the hammer strength press machines.
 
Free weights, I do triceps (2 excersises) on machines, other than that Freeeeee weights 4 life
 
SpikeyLizard said:
Freeweights. Machines for seated rows, lat pulls (when I do them), leg press, and cable crossovers. That's IT.

Same here, but I use machines for leg curls & extensions as well.
 
Back
Top