Muscletech cell tech VS BSN cell mass

[gogetter]

which one would you recommend of the two????

i know the cell tech offers a little more extras like BCAA'S and ALA, but the creatine in it is monohydrate whereas BSN has estered creatine.

 

[Suareezay]

whichevers on sale.

 

[gogetter]

in talking from a performance perspective...... not price

 

[Suareezay]

obviously.

theyre both just glorified, underdosed creatine products. good luck finding any discernible difference from using the two.

youd be better off with a pre-workout stimulant product paired with plain creatine and carbs post-workout (cell tech is ultimately just creatine and carbs anyway).

 

[windshield]

is there a 3rd option?

 

[mcchunter]

3rd

no trac
black powder

 

[gogetter]

no trac
black powder

.....what is that... a preworkout?

 

[mcchunter]

re

yes with creatine
try no trac by mhp
i had good results
taste nasty but is effective

 

[gogetter]

yes with creatine
try no trac by mhp
i had good results
taste nasty but is effective

got ya. ill deff look into that

 

[Eze]

My advice:

Read the back of the label
Write down the list of ingredients
Take your piece of paper with you to a computer
Go to a website that sells bulk powders
Buy the ingredients that you listed from the back of the label
Mix the powders together
BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!
You now have Cell_Tech or Cell Mass at a fraction of the price

 

[gogetter]

yeah i came across a site that does that, looks alot cheaper. but as far as from a performance perspective can anybody tell me which gave them better results.

 

[Eze]

You are never going to find a LEGAL miracle supplement. If that is what you are looking for, keep on trying.

Like you were told earlier, they are both creatine products with a few extras thrown in, but the main ingredient is creatine.

 

[gogetter]

... not even. just asking for some oppinions.if anyone knew any major differences. i know where the miracles are at...

 

[Eze]

Read the ingredients, what are the differences?

 

[bigjd69]

MuscleTech products are too expensive

 

[HeHateMe]

I always liked Phosphagen HP with a shot of slin. Don't try this at home!

 

[Big Dane]

Get some dextrose and some creatine monohydrate and presto, Cell Tech.

 

[adidamps2]

Read the ingredients, what are the differences?

i just dont think our friend understands what you and Suar were trying to tell him.

 

[gogetter]

i just dont think our friend understands what you and Suar were trying to tell him.

what i was wondering is if anyone could teel major differences between the creatine mono in cell mass and the cee and alkalined creatine + ala + other supps in cell tech. i know esentially they are the same thing but one has more and diff supps on top of it.

 

[Suareezay]

what i was wondering is if anyone could teel major differences between the creatine mono in cell mass and the cee and alkalined creatine + ala + other supps in cell tech. i know esentially they are the same thing but one has more and diff supps on top of it.

creatine mono: oldest and most researched/studied form of creatine, works for most people not for others, causes water some amount of water retention.

all these new fangled CEE's and tri-creatine malates etc supposedly cause no water retention, and supposedly more people "respond" to it, but they are less studied. also generally more expensive to some degree, but the effective doses tend to be smaller.

most of the other crap they put in supplements (save for a few) will have zero noticeable effect whatsoever. in the end, racking your brain over which creatine to choose over another is comparable to deciding which shoe laces to buy. in the end it doesnt make the slightest difference. just buy some creatine mono or creatine cee and eat some carbs.