Some Antioxidant Supplements Linked to Lethality WTF!!!

intrinsic1

Livin' the dream....
COPENHAGEN, Feb. 27 -- The antioxidant supplements beta carotene and vitamins A and E have a dark side, carrying an increased risk of all-cause mortality, according to a meta-analysis of 68 randomized trials. Action Points

Explain to interested patients that in this study not only were there no health benefits from taking beta carotene and vitamins A and E supplements, but these antioxidants increased the risk of all-cause death.
In high-quality trials, singly or combined, after exclusion of selenium trials, beta carotene was associated with a 7% increased risk of mortality (RR, 1.07; CI, 1.02-1.11), Goran Bjelakovic, M.D., of the Copenhagen University Hospital here, and colleagues, reported in the Feb. 28 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.


Recent studies, the researchers added, have suggested that beta carotene may act as a cocarcinogen.


Meanwhile, vitamin A had a 16% increased mortality risk (RR, 1.16, CI, 1.10-1.24), while for vitamin E, the mortality risk was 4% (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07), a finding in agreement with another recent meta-analysis. The dose of vitamin E had no effect on mortality in this analysis, the investigators said.


These data emerged from a meta-analysis of the effect of antioxidant supplements in randomized primary and secondary prevention trials published by October 2005, that included 232,606 participants, mean age 62.


In the analysis, vitamin C and selenium came through with no excess mortality risk, although their potential role, either harmful or beneficial, requires further study, according to the Danish group.


Many people taking antioxidant supplement have come to believe the pills make them healthier and prevent disease, although whether these supplements are harmful or beneficial has been uncertain, said Dr. Bjelakovic.


These findings contradict those of observational studies, claiming that antioxidants improve health. Considering that 10% to 20% of the adult population (80 to 160 million people) in North America and Europe may consume the assessed supplements, the public health consequences may be substantial. "We are exposed to intense marketing with a contrary statement," the investigators cautioned.


The trials were classified as high-quality or low-quality, according to the methods (randomization, blinding, and follow-up) used in the studies. The trials were conducted in Europe, North and South America, Asia, and Australia. Mean duration of follow-up was 3.3 years.


The researchers noted that they were able to assess only all-cause mortality, although it was likely that increased cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality were the main components of the increase.


When supplement risks from all low- and high-quality trials were pooled, there was no significant effect on mortality (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98-1.06), the researchers reported.


However, in 47 high-quality trials with 180,938 participants, the antioxidant supplements overall were associated with a 5% increased risk of mortality (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02- 1.08).


There was no evidence that vitamin C increased longevity, and there was also no evidence to refute a potential negative effect of vitamin C on survival. According to the CIs, small beneficial or large harmful effects cannot be excluded, the researchers wrote.


Selenium given singly or in combination with other supplements tended to decrease mortality when analyzed separately. However, after low-quality trials were removed from the analysis, the effect disappeared. Results of ongoing randomized trials with selenium will likely increase our understanding of the effects of selenium, the researchers said.


There are several possible explanations for the negative effect of antioxidant supplements on mortality, Dr. Bjelakovic and colleagues wrote. Although oxidative stress has a hypothesized role in the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases, it may be the consequence of pathological conditions.


"By eliminating free radicals from our organism, we interfere with some essential defensive mechanisms like apoptosis, phagocytosis, and detoxification," the investigators wrote.


"Antioxidant supplements are synthetic and not subjected to the same rigorous toxicity studies as other pharmaceutical agents," they added. What is needed, they said, is a better understanding of mechanisms and actions of antioxidants in relation to a potential disease.


Because this study examined only the influence of synthetic antioxidants, these findings should not be translated to potential effects of fruits and vegetables, they cautioned.


The researchers noted many study limitations. As in all systematic reviews, the findings and interpretations are limited by the quality of available evidence, they said. These populations came mostly from countries without overt deficiencies of specific supplements, and so it was not possible to assess the effects of supplementation in groups with specific needs.


Other limitations included comparison of different antioxidants with different properties, given at different doses and duration, singly or combined. Also, there is debate about whether vitamin A is an antioxidant, they said.


Most trials assessed combinations of different supplements, which reflects the way supplements are marketed and taken by people. In addition, the researchers were not able to point to the specific biochemical mechanisms behind the detrimental effects.


Trials examining the individual supplements singly were rare. Finally, most trials investigated the effects of supplements administered at higher doses than those commonly found in a balanced diet, and some of the trials used doses well above the recommended daily allowances.


Summing up, Dr. Bjelakovic's team wrote, "We did not find convincing evidence that antioxidant supplements have beneficial effects on mortality. Even more, beta carotene, vitamin A, and vitamin E seem to increase the risk of death. Further randomized trials are needed to establish the effects of vitamin C and selenium
 
i saw that on yahoo news but i didnt put much stock in it . heres an example of another quality study quoted there lol .




Ice cream may aid fertility for some By MARILYNN MARCHIONE, AP Medical Writer
Tue Feb 27, 9:31 PM ET



Ben & Jerry might help you get pregnant, but not in the usual way. A diet rich in ice cream and other high-fat dairy foods may lower the risk of one type of infertility, a study suggests. It sounds too good to be true and probably is, some doctors say.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the findings are bound to get attention because they are from the well-known Nurses Health Study at the Harvard School of Public Health and were published Wednesday in the European journal Human Reproduction.

Researchers found that women who ate two or more low-fat dairy products a day were nearly twice as likely to have trouble conceiving because of lack of ovulation than women who ate less than one serving of such foods a week.

Conversely, women who ate at least one fatty dairy food a day were 27 percent less likely to have this problem.

Even the researchers say women should not make too much of these results, which are based on reports of what women said they ate over many years — not a rigorous, scientific experiment where specific dietary factors could be studied in isolation.

"The idea is not to go crazy and start to have ice cream three times a day," said the lead author, Dr. Jorge Chavarro, a research fellow at Harvard. "But it is certainly possible to have a healthy diet with low saturated fat intake by having one serving of high-fat dairy a day."

Others urged caution.

"A good healthy dose of skepticism is good for people," especially when the results are so hard to swallow, said Dr. Patrick Remington, a University of Wisconsin-Madison epidemiologist.

After all, the Nurses Health Study also found that menopause hormones could ward off heart disease — something doctors believed until a more scientific study disproved it several years ago, he noted.

The new research doesn't even apply to most cases of female infertility — not ovulating is to blame only one-third of the time.

The study also found no link between infertility and dairy foods in general — something that bothered another statistics expert, David Allison at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Instead, researchers only saw a link when they separated non-ovulating women who ate yogurt and other low-fat dairy products from those eating more high-fat varieties.

When they looked at specific foods — and this is where the numbers really get tricky — they found that women eating ice cream two or more times a week had a 38 percent lower risk of infertility than women consuming ice cream less than once a week.

Researchers adjusted the results to reflect differences in weight, exercise levels and other factors, but many specialists said they suspect weight is still mostly responsible for the results.

Weight extremes — being too thin or too fat — raises the risk of any sort of infertility, said Dr. William Gibbons, who runs a fertility clinic in Baton Rouge, La., and is president of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Other research shows that women eating lots of low-fat dairy also eat other low-fat foods and try to lose weight, said Dr. Zev Rosenwaks, director of Weill Cornell University and New York Presbyterian's fertility services.

His interpretation of the new study: "It's not that having high fat is protective. It's that being on a diet may be bad for reproduction."

The Harvard study, funded by the university and a long-running federal study, involved 18,555 women, ages 24 to 42, who became pregnant or tried to from 1991-99. Among them, 3,430 reported infertility, including 2,165 who saw a doctor for it. Of those, 438 said an ovulation problem was to blame.

The women filled out questionnaires every two years on what they ate and how often. Those who ate more high-fat dairy foods were more likely to consume alcohol and to already have had a child, and less likely to exercise than those eating low-fat dairy products. Researchers said they adjusted for these factors and still saw the link to ovulation-related infertility.

If women do eat more high-fat dairy foods to try to boost their odds of conceiving, it would be important to cut calories elsewhere to avoid gaining weight, doctors said. They also should switch back to low-fat dairy
 
were the anti-oxident vitamins they used for these trials "natural" or synthetic? it never states..also the mean age was friggin 62 yrs old...probably already have some sorta health issues. i call BS on thre whole thing. too many inconcistency and too many things out side the scope of thngs that would effect me.
 
the meta-analysis that they used is considered flawed and widely criticized.


for instance, they eliminated studies (a huge number of them) that they considered too favorable.
 
Back
Top