Do you think one of them is using gear pt. 2

71Avido said:
Only if you and Dre are pulling the strings so to speak.

WTF that movie had a $7 million dollar budget?!
Click to expand...

Wikipedia says $15 mil LOL!! Apparently it pulled $30 mil in box office. That was a ridiculous amount of money back then. I don't remember the movie very much, but it definitely didn't seem like it would cost $15 or even $7 million to make.
 
CptFKNplanet said:
Wikipedia says $15 mil LOL!! Apparently it pulled $30 mil in box office. That was a ridiculous amount of money back then. I don't remember the movie very much, but it definitely didn't seem like it would cost $15 or even $7 million to make.
Click to expand...

They must have some baller-ass catering.

Isn't it odd that after all these years and all the movies that have been produced, when adjusted for inflation Gone With the Wind is STILL the highest grossing movie in history? Adjusted for inflation it pulled in $3.2 BILLION dollars. Eat a dick Avatar!

I'd settle for a paltry couple mill.
 
3qeyo4.jpg
 
71Avido said:
They must have some baller-ass catering.

Isn't it odd that after all these years and all the movies that have been produced, when adjusted for inflation Gone With the Wind is STILL the highest grossing movie in history? Adjusted for inflation it pulled in $3.2 BILLION dollars.

I'd settle for a paltry couple mill.
Click to expand...

LOL. Yeah, I don't understand that. I haven't seen the movie though, and have no desire to ever watch it. All 8 Harry Potter movies COMBINED don't even total $3 billion and those were some fuckin popular movies.

Shit I'd settle for A mill. As long as you invest it properly you could still easily retire off that.
 
CptFKNplanet said:
LOL. Yeah, I don't understand that. I haven't seen the movie though, and have no desire to ever watch it. All 8 Harry Potter movies COMBINED don't even total $3 billion and those were some fuckin popular movies.

Shit I'd settle for A mill. As long as you invest it properly you could still easily retire off that.
Click to expand...

I think it has a lot to do with market saturation.
There are just so many fucking movies out these days it dilutes the profits on a per-film basis.
Back when Gone With the Wind was out, it was probably the only thing in theaters and the next movie coming out was 3 years away. It's speculation but it sounds good!
 
Woohoo, I just found something that binds to polypropylene AND has opacity!

Tonight gents, I celebrate.... again...
 
71Avido said:
I think it has a lot to do with market saturation.
There are just so many fucking movies out these days it dilutes the profits on a per-film basis.
Back when Gone With the Wind was out, it was probably the only thing in theaters and the next movie coming out was 3 years away. It's speculation but it sounds good!
Click to expand...

That's actually probably not far from accurate. Plus EVERYONE loved that movie back then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top