ED vs EOD HUGE difference in blood results

[RogerC11]

I just received my mid cycle blood results. This is my second cycle and it consists of 260mg/wk of test prop and 260mg/wk of NPP. This is an 8 week cycle. I decided I wanted to try ED pinning this time around. Just to give a little background information, my first cycle was test prop 6 weeks at 350mg/wk pinning eod.


Pre cycle bloodwork test levels: 588ng/dl
My first cycle bloodwork test levels came back at 1050ng/dl at week 3 of 6. EOD pinning
Second cycle bloodwork test levels came back at 2352ng/dl at week 4 of 8. ED pinning

Blood was drawn at same time of day for both cycles.
I knew ED is known to be better for less side effects but what amazed me is the huge difference in total test even when using a lower dosage. Just wanted to share. I will be going with ED pinning for all future cycles.

 

[Megatron28]

I don't think so -- you are taking 25% less testosterone this cycle. Which testosterone lab assay did you have performed? It is well documented that Nandrolone causes a false-positive reading as testosterone in the ECLIA method. You need to have the LC/MS-MS method performed as it is more accurate. See the following for more info.

http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/k093421.pdf

 

[49ER]

Your test was bunk as fuck my capped test at 1500 was reached by 250mg of test ew pinned once

 

[RogerC11]

Bunk test? Did you even read my post?

 

[RogerC11]

Female hormone panel was used for the blood tests.

 

[49ER]

Bunk test? Did you even read my post?

Yes i did its bunk 1050 is low and test p is more mg than my 250 test e

 

[RogerC11]

Cool, I appreciate your input.

 

[49ER]

But yes everyday is better if thats what you choose to do

 

[Megatron28]

Female hormone panel was used for the blood tests.

In other words ECLIA assay.

 

[tx045]

Cool, I appreciate your input.

It's not only input it's fact

 

[Therealkozmo]

it is definitely weak gear