RoidBurger
New member
Can someone give me some solid science on this?
(studies, facts, statistics, charts, data, etc)
Explaining why someone with slightly low natural production of Testosterone (around 400) taking Androgel (or even injections) in an intermittent dosing fashion (a week on, week off) would be a bad thing?
Someone who still naturally hovers around 410 still has some power in that HPA machine, and its still chugging away, albeit sluggishly. Rather than completely kill that, why couldn't they mimick the natural hormone cycle and "supplement" it in a cyclical, intermittent fashion to keep receptors sensitive, keep HPA running, and also enjoy that initial "burst" of both exo and endo testosterone we all get in the first week or two?
The goal here is to avoid the intial burst, followed by the months and years of crap libido and vitality that comes with shutting down the HPA. (Im aware of taking HCG also so lets avoid that discussion if possible).
Please note: I am not looking for opinions.
Can this be the first thread on this topic where actual data is used to back up opinions? I've read tons of threads on this and its always a big gathering of subjective speculating. I am aware of the pervading theory that one must always maintain a consistent dosing schedule. But I have not heard any actual data why this methodology is dangerous or damaging to your health.
I am seriously considering it, because hormones cycle monthly in a natural state for both men and women. No doubt HPA shuts down and starts up even in a natural state, to some extent. Why would duplicating that environment be dangerous for you?
Thanks
(studies, facts, statistics, charts, data, etc)
Explaining why someone with slightly low natural production of Testosterone (around 400) taking Androgel (or even injections) in an intermittent dosing fashion (a week on, week off) would be a bad thing?
Someone who still naturally hovers around 410 still has some power in that HPA machine, and its still chugging away, albeit sluggishly. Rather than completely kill that, why couldn't they mimick the natural hormone cycle and "supplement" it in a cyclical, intermittent fashion to keep receptors sensitive, keep HPA running, and also enjoy that initial "burst" of both exo and endo testosterone we all get in the first week or two?
The goal here is to avoid the intial burst, followed by the months and years of crap libido and vitality that comes with shutting down the HPA. (Im aware of taking HCG also so lets avoid that discussion if possible).
Please note: I am not looking for opinions.
Can this be the first thread on this topic where actual data is used to back up opinions? I've read tons of threads on this and its always a big gathering of subjective speculating. I am aware of the pervading theory that one must always maintain a consistent dosing schedule. But I have not heard any actual data why this methodology is dangerous or damaging to your health.
I am seriously considering it, because hormones cycle monthly in a natural state for both men and women. No doubt HPA shuts down and starts up even in a natural state, to some extent. Why would duplicating that environment be dangerous for you?
Thanks