KenMasters
New member
Hello everyone.
I know I don't write that much in here and I apologize, but I work 14hours a day and have to spend 2-3 hours at the gym and at least 1 hour for on home works and dog stuff and also not forget sleep, but I do read a lot from you guys here and respect everyone who is doing an amazing job and hope you all can keep helping us "noobs" to fill the gap on some things here and there every now and then.
Anyway, here is a question I have for anyone who wishes to answer.
In my last post
steroidology.com/forum/anabolic-steroid-forum/678979-thinking-doing-2nd-cycle-any-thoughts.html#post3651140
I was looking to see what my second cycle should be and got some nice advice from lots of people who I greatly appreciate. Now, recently a friend of a friend (who happens to be a bodybuilder/trainer) approached me and told me about SARMS. Up till yesterday I knew nothing about these things, his pitch was sounding so cool and amazing at first, telling me that with SARM you do not need PCT, they are not toxic to the liver, they do no damage to the body, they do not bloat you or retain water, etc...etc. He kept insisting on not doing AAS cycles and start SARM cycles which are the BOMB in the US right now (his words exactly). So I did some research on SARMS and on many blogs and forums I see people that are either for SARMS or against them saying that PCT is still needed with SARMS, also that they are not as good as AAS and also something about Cancer problems. This last part had me worried really since in my family we have had many Cancer deaths and do not want anything that can risk this. I'm not sure if I got all the correct info on these stuff or not so I'm asking anyone who can shed a bit more light to the subject. Do you think that SARMS is a better choice from AAS? As I said in the past I'm not a person who wishes to continue cycling for the rest of my life but do a few AAS cycles to bulk up, then cut and then keep any gains I can keep naturally. Hope to hear from you guys.
I know I don't write that much in here and I apologize, but I work 14hours a day and have to spend 2-3 hours at the gym and at least 1 hour for on home works and dog stuff and also not forget sleep, but I do read a lot from you guys here and respect everyone who is doing an amazing job and hope you all can keep helping us "noobs" to fill the gap on some things here and there every now and then.
Anyway, here is a question I have for anyone who wishes to answer.
In my last post
steroidology.com/forum/anabolic-steroid-forum/678979-thinking-doing-2nd-cycle-any-thoughts.html#post3651140
I was looking to see what my second cycle should be and got some nice advice from lots of people who I greatly appreciate. Now, recently a friend of a friend (who happens to be a bodybuilder/trainer) approached me and told me about SARMS. Up till yesterday I knew nothing about these things, his pitch was sounding so cool and amazing at first, telling me that with SARM you do not need PCT, they are not toxic to the liver, they do no damage to the body, they do not bloat you or retain water, etc...etc. He kept insisting on not doing AAS cycles and start SARM cycles which are the BOMB in the US right now (his words exactly). So I did some research on SARMS and on many blogs and forums I see people that are either for SARMS or against them saying that PCT is still needed with SARMS, also that they are not as good as AAS and also something about Cancer problems. This last part had me worried really since in my family we have had many Cancer deaths and do not want anything that can risk this. I'm not sure if I got all the correct info on these stuff or not so I'm asking anyone who can shed a bit more light to the subject. Do you think that SARMS is a better choice from AAS? As I said in the past I'm not a person who wishes to continue cycling for the rest of my life but do a few AAS cycles to bulk up, then cut and then keep any gains I can keep naturally. Hope to hear from you guys.