Peptide Use

H 3 L L S M A N

New member
There was a recent thread on the use of AAS at a young age, many people said back then there was no knowledge and no one knew any better.

Because peptides are relatively new and there are new ones coming out all the time will this generation be the same as the old school AAS generation and regret using some of these things 20-30 years down the road, what do you think the chances are.

I know that there cannot be a defined answer right now but do the benefits of peptides out way the risks of using them.
 
Last edited:
You bring up a very interesting point. You're right. There's no way of knowing for sure until it's too late. However, if you look at how popular these peptides are getting it's easy to see that the perceived benefits of the peptides outweigh the possible risks involved in using them. It's getting so popular, you can't even pick up a vial of bac water for cheap anymore. Some places are even backordered!

It's human nature to want an advantage and people see these as an advantage over using nothing. Only time will tell if it works out in the end. Luckily I'm almost middle aged so I don't count. LOL
 
You bring up a very interesting point. You're right. There's no way of knowing for sure until it's too late. However, if you look at how popular these peptides are getting it's easy to see that the perceived benefits of the peptides outweigh the possible risks involved in using them. It's getting so popular, you can't even pick up a vial of bac water for cheap anymore. Some places are even backordered!

It's human nature to want an advantage and people see these as an advantage over using nothing. Only time will tell if it works out in the end. Luckily I'm almost middle aged so I don't count. LOL
I am wondering is there have been cases where peptide use has suppressed the natural process to the point where replacement therapy is needed. Like testicular atrophy when HCG is not used.
 
Last edited:
Depends on the peptide I'm sure. GHRPs/GNRHs I see posing little threat since they only bolster natural GH secretion in a pulsate fashion, as opposed to traditional HGH which introduces chronic levels of synthetic GH into your system.
 
ghrp is great for hgh users stimulates natural gh production again most of the peptides have a descent clinical test record at lease in rats lol. like anything abuse is abuse...more doesnt mean better. igf req. time off. id say the risk is fairly low. the baggage aas brings is greater.
 
Last edited:
Excellent thread.... After a fair amount of reading, I chose to add Igf-1 lr3 to my test/Tren cycle. Since I'm planning a long cycle... The thought of actually adding new muscle fibers seems like very promising science. An almost irresistible thought really. Most of the sites make peptides sound safe yet "cutting edge."
I just completed my first week of pins... 50mcg split bilaterally into muscle being worked < 5 minutes PWO.
I don't know what it's doing... But it's definitely doing something. I woke up this morning after sleeping 12 hours straight.... Let me remind you, I'm on Tren... Who sleeps 12 hours on Tren!!!.... And all the Igf target muscles that I pinned are stiff... My body feels like that of a growing tean-ager!
 
Excellent thread.... After a fair amount of reading, I chose to add Igf-1 lr3 to my test/Tren cycle. Since I'm planning a long cycle... The thought of actually adding new muscle fibers seems like very promising science. An almost irresistible thought really. Most of the sites make peptides sound safe yet "cutting edge."
I just completed my first week of pins... 50mcg split bilaterally into muscle being worked < 5 minutes PWO.
I don't know what it's doing... But it's definitely doing something. I woke up this morning after sleeping 12 hours straight.... Let me remind you, I'm on Tren... Who sleeps 12 hours on Tren!!!.... And all the Igf target muscles that I pinned are stiff... My body feels like that of a growing tean-ager!
Thanks for the feedback I am also looking to do a little IGF-1 LR3 on cycle and use as a bridge between, properly cycling on and off the stuff.

12 hours straight sleep sounds good to me.
 
I am wondering is there have been cases where peptide use has suppressed the natural process to the point where replacement therapy is needed. Like testicular atrophy when HCG is not used.

No man. GH peps don't shut your pituitary down like HGH dose. Its not like a replacement dose, it just causes a natural GH pulse.

Peptides are shit and not worth even if prices were slashed in half.

Really? What have your run peptide wise that you can say this? I'm sure the 1000's of people running them have gotten absolutely no benefits from them. That would make a lot of sense.
 
Back
Top