QUIT emailing me with Source Checks from Aol and Yahoo!!

Drveejay11

Drveejay11

Community Veteran
There are a TON of quality choices! PICK ONE!

Thank you!

CryptoAnywhere. Powerful encryption so small it fits on a floppy disk. Can be used virtually anywhere with no need for installation. Message recipient does not need CryptoAnywhere.


CryptoHeaven


Cyber-Rights.Net. Secure Web-based email, offered by Cyber-Rights & Cyber-Liberties, a nonprofit civil liberties organization.


Ensuredmail. Easy-to-use encryption software that protects your email and attachments.


HushMail. Web-based secure email.


KeptPrivate. Web email client accessible over an SSL connection.


Mail2Web. Check your mail securely and privately on the road (or on your cellular phone).


Mute Mail. Anonymizing e-mail activites. Sending e-mails anonymously, securely and snoop-proff. All messages are encrypted. Sender's identity is confidential.


NeoCertified. Secure Email and messaging.


NeoMailbox. Secure, private, SSL-encrypted POP and SMTP mail service.


S-Mail - Secure mail.


SafeMessage. Encrypted messages, delivery status, and automatic shredding.


Sec-Ex Mail. Strong encryption that works with any e-mail client, no plugins needed. Supports automatic key exchange.


Sneakemail.com.


SoftClan E-Cryptor.


Stealth Message. Web-based e-mail privacy with option to self-destruct.


Temple Mail.


Zendit. Plug-in that makes it easy to use PGP with e-mail programs like Outlook, or with Web-based e-mail.


Ziplip.com. A free e-mail service that will scramble, lock, and then shred email.


CLICK here for an explanation and addy! http://www.epic.org/privacy/tools.html
 
Last edited:
Add me to that list Doc. I get way TOO MANY Emails from people with unsecure Email accounts.
 
Other than IP masking and such though, interservice webmail clients wont encrypt unless they share keys. PGP obviously allows public keys (PKI), so long as you have a key uploaded to the web and the person encrypts it so that you are allowed to read it.

So this limits us to Hushmail/Cyber-Rights if we wanted to encrypt things to each other and were not on the same service.

Unless everyone started using PGP, but then we get back to the IP masking.
 
Mudge said:
Other than IP masking and such though, interservice webmail clients wont encrypt unless they share keys. PGP obviously allows public keys (PKI), so long as you have a key uploaded to the web and the person encrypts it so that you are allowed to read it.

So this limits us to Hushmail/Cyber-Rights if we wanted to encrypt things to each other and were not on the same service.

Unless everyone started using PGP, but then we get back to the IP masking.
Click to expand...

:confused:

Speak English.......:p
 
Yep, MVMAXX will have something to add I'm sure. Ziplip at some point about a year ago actually started unmasking ALL IPs which freaked people out, so I would be able to tell from your email basically where you lived, and someone with friends at your ISP or who didn't like you could go even further (or someone with time on thier hands).

If we are looking to encryption as one of our ways of staying safe though, then obviously we have to sign up for the same service as the people we are talking too.
 
If someone was that much of an idiot that they email you from aol, I wouldn't give them a source at all even if they got another email account. They obviously have not done enough research on things to know how things work, and they are only inches away from screwing things up for others as well as themselves.
 
I don't give sources away to anyone except for people I know are MODs and vets from boards that I frequently post on. Even then, I am still pretty strict as to who gets a source and who doesn't. 9/10 times it's a no go. It's not worth me losing a good source, or a source getting busted becuase the wrong person got their contact info.
 
I understand that, I personally would never give anybody that used an aol account anything. Even if they changed over to a valid secure account for emails. I am saying they didn't do any of their homework and want to just jump into the game. Not saying you did or didn't, just agreeing with you that it is idiotic of them.
 
We are talking source checks though not even handing them out. I dont even respond, I just delete the emails, if people pay attention they should know these basic rules by now.
 
Its like the people with zero posts that start PMing for sources. Or I remember one person that asked me in PM months ago, "so like when I've been around for a few months should I just expect a list of sources sometime?"

:laugh4: WTF?
 
I can't stand people that do that. I had a kid that kept asking me where I got mine from and wouldn't leave me alone. Finally I just gave him a site that I knew was a scam. He sent out 300 bucks to buy some gear and never got a damn thing. When he asked me I said I don't know maybe he turned scammer. Well, neadless to say that guy doesn't bother me for anything anymore. Which is the way I want it. Lessen to be learned.
 
Mudge said:
I remember one person that asked me in PM months ago, "so like when I've been around for a few months should I just expect a list of sources sometime?"

:laugh4: WTF?
Click to expand...

LOL..............C-L-A-S-S-I-C !!! :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Tips For Secruity On The Net. Everyone Should Read!
2
Replies
25
Views
5K
spearofdestiny
S
Back
Top