STUDIES: Test Levels Post PCT?

AlmightyZeus

New member
Hey guys,

Just curious if you peeps had any studies on what potential test levels would return to, or become after a cycle.

For example, I'm natural right now and my test is 534 ng/dL. What might it be after a perfectly executed cycle of 500mg test (hcg + AI on cycle, PCT = Clomid + Nolva) ? I've heard some guys might be a bit higher and eventually come back down to normal. and of course horror stories that it doesn't rebound to well.

Thanks, & merry xmas


EDIT:

Personal stories/results would be nice as well!
 
Last edited:
Hopefully it will return to the same level -- just know that your 534 wasmone point in time. Your TT is always fluctuating.

But experience shows that the more cycles you run, that over time your TT levels will decrease and yuiu will eventually have to go on TRT.

There is always the risk too that after a cycle your Natty T does not bounce back. It could happen your first cycle, 7th cycle or never.
 
Hopefully it will return to the same level -- just know that your 534 wasmone point in time. Your TT is always fluctuating.

But experience shows that the more cycles you run, that over time your TT levels will decrease and yuiu will eventually have to go on TRT.

There is always the risk too that after a cycle your Natty T does not bounce back. It could happen your first cycle, 7th cycle or never.

Lets say my recovering is bad and im going to TRT. Well, is there a risk i wont have a baby? I run hCG on cycle.
 
Hopefully it will return to the same level -- just know that your 534 wasmone point in time. Your TT is always fluctuating.

But experience shows that the more cycles you run, that over time your TT levels will decrease and yuiu will eventually have to go on TRT.

There is always the risk too that after a cycle your Natty T does not bounce back. It could happen your first cycle, 7th cycle or never.

Finally a legitimate answer. Appreciate that mega. That is the question most naturals fear to ask, because it's the truth.

So let me ask you this... what is considered healthy, or unhealthy? TRT is obviously healthy, more pros than cons.. so is anything more than 200mg's a week considered "unhealthy" ?
For example:

If one were to run a cycle every few years within the ages of 25-45.. lets say 5-10 cycles in his lifetime. And these cycles consisted of low moderated doses, introducing mild compounds, maybe some orals, and blood work was checked frequently... would that individual live a much SHORTER life than he was originally predetermined to live before his AAS use? 10-20 years less?

I know that's such a general question but I guess what I'm trying to get at, is what is considered healthy, or unhealthy? (when it comes to AAS use) Also to better help the question, my definitely of healthy is living a long life, no crazy health issues, only those that come with old age.

Thanks again
 
Finally a legitimate answer. Appreciate that mega. That is the question most naturals fear to ask, because it's the truth.

So let me ask you this... what is considered healthy, or unhealthy? TRT is obviously healthy, more pros than cons.. so is anything more than 200mg's a week considered "unhealthy" ?
For example:

If one were to run a cycle every few years within the ages of 25-45.. lets say 5-10 cycles in his lifetime. And these cycles consisted of low moderated doses, introducing mild compounds, maybe some orals, and blood work was checked frequently... would that individual live a much SHORTER life than he was originally predetermined to live before his AAS use? 10-20 years less?

I know that's such a general question but I guess what I'm trying to get at, is what is considered healthy, or unhealthy? (when it comes to AAS use) Also to better help the question, my definitely of healthy is living a long life, no crazy health issues, only those that come with old age.

Thanks again

The healthiest would be having your Natty T. Going on TRT is a life saver if you need it, but it is best avoided.

One of the biggest risks of prolonged steroid use (at supraphysiological doses) is heart enlargement which can shorten one's life span or limit it.

Running more than a TRT dose for a long period of time does have health consequences. It is hard on the liver, kidneys, lipids, etc.
 
The healthiest would be having your Natty T. Going on TRT is a life saver if you need it, but it is best avoided.

One of the biggest risks of prolonged steroid use (at supraphysiological doses) is heart enlargement which can shorten one's life span or limit it.

Running more than a TRT dose for a long period of time does have health consequences. It is hard on the liver, kidneys, lipids, etc.

What about 1200 ng/dl? Is it risky for health?
 
Are you saying if I use 250 mg/wk forever, my heart will grow or you're talking other steroids?
 
Are you saying if I use 250 mg/wk forever, my heart will grow or you're talking other steroids?

He's saying it CAN. Maybe it will....maybe it won't. That's the bad part about this lifestyle. Any compound can cause any complication in any person. Genetics and predisposition also play a large role in who is effected by what in which way.
 
He's saying it CAN. Maybe it will....maybe it won't. That's the bad part about this lifestyle. Any compound can cause any complication in any person. Genetics and predisposition also play a large role in who is effected by what in which way.

Yes but studies find no cardiovascular risk on TRT below 40.
 
Back
Top