TRT - A UK Doctor's Perspective

Hoodlum

New member
So I've been trying to get a private doctor I know (not a TRT expert, but has been consulting with one of his colleagues who is) to help me out by running my lab work more cheaply than I can get it done on Harley St, and on the advice of his colleague, wants nothing to do with me because I am self-administering. I got involved into a lengthy conversation with him regarding the ethics of the situation, and why I was unwilling to submit to being treated by the doctors in this country. Some interesting points came up during the discussion, which I thought I'd share.

To my assertion that the UK was "prehistoric" in its approach:
In America, Testosterone Replacement Therapy became a big trend: when I was in [redacted] mid-1990's, I bought 'Time' Magazine, and the Front Cover was entitled 'Testosterone' and was explaining about the new possibilities for men with Testosterone Replacement Therapy...at the time it was comparing TRT to HRT in women as a step forward in helping keep men young, but we know what happened to the HRT situation. I think what happened next was that the American (Private) doctors who were giving TRT started realizing that by itself it was causing problems, (as you have explained to me: testicular atrophy and gynaecomastia), so they had to start giving medicines to counter these effects. It is all unregulated, and we don't have long-term data, and no proper trials are being done, as it is all driven by private medicine.
My comment: I can understand where he's coming from with the assertion that there is a potential conflict of interest in private medicine when considering the drive for profit above patient health. The gist of the argument boils down though to "we don't know whether it's bad or not yet long term, so never mind how you feel, stay on these 8-weekly nebido shots with no AI and HCG. Enjoy those boobs and small balls."

Continuing:
From Wikipedia on Testosterone Replacement Therapy: ....On +January 31, 2014, reports of strokes, heart attacks, and deaths in men taking FDA-approved testosterone-replacement led the Food and Drug Administration to announce that it would be investigating this issue.[4] FDA's action followed three peer-reviewed studies of increased cardiovascular events and deaths. A summary of the first study was published online +Jan. 29 in the journal PLoS One.[5] But, the full report is also publicly available. [6] Also in November 2013, a study in the "Journal of the American Medical Association" reported an increase of 30% in deaths and heart attacks in older men.[7] The Testosterone in Older Men with Mobility Limitations (TOM) trial, a National Institute of Aging randomized trial, was halted early by the Data Safety and Monitoring Committee because the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events was higher in the testosterone group than the placebo group.[8]
Ultimately - if it means keeping my nuts, feeling good all the time (and not just 4 weeks every 2 months after a shot) and not having a pair of boobs - then I'll take my chances with the 30% increase in chance of heart attacks (which is a figure I'm somewhat dubious of - how on earth would they control for the myriad variables such as lifestyle, diet, exercise habits etc which would have a conflating effect. It's become my default position to be extremely skeptical of any of these studies, unless independently verified by numerous others.
That said, who on here has any knowledge of this issue? I'm going to do some reading up on the matter. I don't particularly want to increase my risk of heart attack if there's any way to avoid it, if the studies are actually legitimate.

In reply to my request for help with the bloodwork:
The bottom line is, if I were seen to be running your blood tests in any way at all, and something happened to you, I would be seen to be endorsing what you were doing, and I would be help responsible. If you are going to do this treatment, you should find some doctor in the UK who is a Testosterone Replacement Specialist, (I am not), and who is prepared to take responsibility for your treatment. Alternatively, you could ask your GP: may be worth asking. Another idea would be to find a Private clinic, show them how much you know about this area, and ask them to do a special deal with you (price wise), since you know that things can be done much cheaper (than they charge), and since you intend to be with them long-term: i.e. explain to them fully the predicament you are in.
Basically, go back to the people who sent you out of an office with a box of gels, no AI, and no HCG, leading to you having half-shrunken aching nuts and puffy nipples a month later, before you decided to take matters into your own hands. It's like arguing with a brick wall.

The main thing of note which gives me pause however is the 30% elevated chance of heart attack. Is this controlling for elevated hematocrit I wonder? As mentioned above, I'd be curious if anyone on here has more knowledge of the issue.

Cheers
 
The increasing hematocrit is the only main thing that would trigger strokes and heart attacks. Close management of HCT would not lead to any increase in strokes or heart attacks.
 
Elevated Estradiol played a role too with high HCT in the guys that had strokes in the recent study. Many were not on even a sufficient dose to maintain optimal T and they had pre existing heart conditions and then were put in the group for study. If good practice is not used....results are bad.
 
One problem I have with the study that was published in January was that it was just a research project. It wasn't like they followed men on TRT and monitored them closely, they simply went into a database and looked up a bunch of old files, without talking to the doctor or the patient. Not to mention many or most of these patients had a pre existing risk for adverse cardiovascular events. In the study you can see they point out how high their estrogen was. Some men were getting injections of up to 200mg at a time! Were talking about men over 65 with a risk for heart attack already! These doctors obviously administered many poor performing protocols, and thats what happens when you just slap on some testosterone and call it a day without making sure other hormones are titrated as well.

The problem I have with the study in November is were talking about men with mobility issues, we are not talking about regular men that are generally healthy other than their low testosterone. Not to mention a lot of them were on gels, and we all know of guys who got on gels and their T levels actually went down, it happens all the time. Studies reveal it could take up to 6 months to get your TT levels up to 600ng/dl with creams. So my questions is, is it possible these men worsened their T levels? Or more importantly had an unbalance T to E ratio? of course it is and is probably what happened. The ratio is more important than the total, many studies show estradiol higher in men who have had acute heart attacks.

I think what these studies show me is how far behind the average physician is HRT, and is a repeat of what happen to hormones for women and cancer. basically the fad hit and all the doctors started doling out estrogen, and typical in the US physicians are notorious for over prescribing. So this lead to a bunch of woman having E levels that were too high, and it increased their cancer risk, this was all due to poor monitoring and poor dosage titration.

The same thing is happening now with T replacement. Docs started doling out testosterone without the proper monitoring and controlling of E levels, and it increased risk of some mens heart attacks.


Dangers of Excess Estrogen In the Aging Male
By William Faloon
William Faloon
William Faloon
We at Life Extension are sometimes asked why we check estrogen levels when testing the blood of our male members.

Long ago, we published data showing that estrogen levels are often elevated in aging men and discussed the insidious health risks associated with excess estrogen. Since it is so easy for men to correct estrogen overload, it made sense to test for it and recommend the appropriate corrective actions if blood results reveal excessive (or deficient) estrogen.

A presentation at a recent anti-aging conference suggested that higher estrogen levels are beneficial to aging men. This prompted us to search the published scientific literature to see if we had overlooked some recent findings.

What we uncovered not only confirmed our original recommendation, but revealed that excess estrogen in aging men is more dangerous than what we even thought.

Double the Stroke Risk
Stroke is the third leading cause of death and the leading cause of age-related disability. Abnormal blood clotting in the cerebral blood vessels is the most common cause of stroke. Excess estrogen promotes abnormal blood clots.1

In a study published just last year, blood levels of estradiol (a potent estrogen) were measured in a group of 2,197 men aged 71 to 93 years of age. Adjustment for age, hypertension, diabetes, adiposity, cholesterol, atrial fibrillation, and other characteristics were made. During the course of follow-up, men with the highest blood levels of estradiol had a 2.2-fold greater risk of stroke compared with those whose estradiol levels were lower.2

This study revealed that estradiol blood levels greater than 34.1 pg/mL resulted in this more than doubling of stroke incidence. Life Extension long ago warned men to keep their estradiol levels below 30 pg/mL, and this recent stroke study clearly validates our prior recommendation.

Excess Estrogen in Middle-Aged Men
One way to evaluate the health of the arterial system is to measure the inner and medial wall of the carotid artery using an ultrasound test.

Excess Estrogen in Middle-Aged Men
In a study published two years ago, blood levels of estradiol were measured in 313 men whose average age was 58. Carotid artery intima-media thickness was measured at baseline and then three years later. After adjusting for other risk factors, men with higher levels of estradiol suffered a worsening thickening of their carotid artery wall. This led the researchers to conclude, ***8220;circulating estradiol is a predictor of progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness in middle-aged men.***8221;3

This study of middle-aged men was initiated based on findings that treatment of men with prostate cancer using orally ingested estrogen drugs is associated with increased cardiovascular events and deaths.

Ultrasound measurement of the carotid artery wall provides an accurate prognostic indicator of arterial disease. The findings in this study show progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness in men with higher estradiol levels. Greater carotid artery intima-media thickness sharply correlates with increased risks of heart attack and stroke.

Estradiol Higher in Male Heart Attack Victims
Estradiol Higher in Male Heart Attack Victims
A study published just last year compared blood levels of testosterone and estradiol in men suffering acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) with those who had previously suffered a heart attack.

Sex hormones were measured in patients presenting with acute heart attack, patients with old heart attack, and patients with normal coronary arteries. The results showed significantly higher levels of estradiol in both groups of heart attack patients compared with those without coronary disease.4 As would be expected from numerous prior studies, heart attack victims also had decreased testosterone levels.

The reason many men suffer from excess estradiol and deficient testosterone is that their aging bodies produce less testosterone while more of their beneficial testosterone is converted (aromatized) into estradiol. The pathological result is an altering of the ratio of testosterone to estrogen, creating estrogen dominance.5 This imbalance of estrogen overload and testosterone insufficiency is an often overlooked cause of cardiovascular disease.

Fortunately, there are safe methods to block the aromatase enzyme in order to lower excess estrogen while boosting free testosterone levels.

High Estrogen in Men With Coronary Atherosclerosis
An invasive diagnostic procedure known as a coronary angiogram can measure the degree of atherosclerosis present in the arteries feeding the heart muscle.

Researchers used angiogram-confirmed cases of coronary atherosclerosis to ascertain the effects of sex hormones and other metabolic factors in a group of men aged 40-60 years.

Compared with healthy age-matched controls, men with coronary atherosclerosis had low testosterone, higher levels of estrone (another potent estrogen), and a low level of testosterone in the presence of a high level of estradiol.6 These findings led the researchers to conclude their study by stating, ***8220;low levels of total testosterone, testosterone/estradiol ratio and free androgen index and higher levels of estrone in men with coronary artery disease appear together with many features of metabolic syndrome and may be involved in the pathogenesis of coronary atherosclerosis.***8221;

High Estrogen in Men With Coronary Atherosclerosis
In a study conducted a year later by another research group, angiograms were used to measure the extent of coronary atherosclerosis in a group of men with stable coronary artery disease. The finding showed significant positive correlations between estradiol levels and other known atherosclerotic risk factors.7 The scientists concluded their study by stating, ***8220;our results indicate a possible role of estradiol in promoting the development of atherogenic lipid milieu in men with coronary artery disease.***8221;

These two recent studies validate other reports showing that excess estrogen promotes atherosclerosis in men.

Peripheral Artery Disease and Sex Hormones
Peripheral artery disease occurs when there is partial or total blockage of an artery, usually one leading to a leg or arm. Leg artery disease is usually due to atherosclerosis that impairs blood circulation. Those afflicted with this condition find that walking can bring on fatigue, cramping, and pain in the hip, buttock, thigh, knee, shin, or upper foot.

A study published last year sought to determine whether blood levels of testosterone and estradiol are associated with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in elderly men.

The participants consisted of 3,014 men with peripheral artery disease who averaged 75.4 years of age. After factoring in age, current smoking, previous smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and body mass index, the findings showed that low levels of testosterone were independently and positively associated with peripheral artery disease as were high levels of estradiol.8

The doctors who conducted this study concluded, ***8220;this cross-sectional study shows for the first time that low serum testosterone and high serum estradiol levels associate with lower extremity peripheral artery disease in elderly men.***8221;

The pharmaceutical industry makes a fortune treating those with peripheral artery disease. Common drugs prescribed include those that lower blood sugar, lower cholesterol (statins), lower blood pressure, and lower risk of blood clot. A popular drug called Plavix® has been heavily advertised to treat peripheral and other arterial diseases.

Based on what is known about the atherogenic and thrombotic risks of low testosterone and high estradiol, it is conceivable that men suffering from peripheral artery disease could discard many of their drugs if they restored their testosterone to youthful ranges and reduced excess estradiol.

High Estradiol Levels Seen in Male Chronic Inflammation Patients
Rheumatoid arthritis is a severe chronic inflammatory state that results in increased risks of heart attack, cancer, and stroke. A study of men with rheumatoid arthritis evaluated blood levels of sex hormones compared with healthy controls.9

Levels of estradiol in rheumatoid arthritis patients were higher and DHEA levels lower compared with subjects who were not suffering from chronic inflammation.9 This corresponds to studies showing that high estrogen levels (in women) can increase C-reactive protein, which is the most accurate marker for systemic inflammation.10-12 Elevated C-reactive protein is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease in healthy individuals.

Another Lethal Mechanism of Excess Estrogen
Another Lethal Mechanism of Excess Estrogen
The number one cause of death in persons over age 50 is the development of an abnormal blood clot (thrombus) in an artery that blocks blood flow to a critical region of the body such as the heart, lungs, or brain. Elevated estrogen predisposes people to these lethal thrombotic events.

It has been found that men admitted in hospitals with myocardial infarcts have elevated estradiol and lower testosterone levels.13 This was shown in an interesting study done on men admitted to the hospital with acute heart attacks whose levels of sex hormones were evaluated. Compared with control patients, estradiol levels in these heart attack patients were 180% higher, while bioavailable testosterone levels were nearly three times less than those of control patients.14

These findings reveal the higher heart attack incidences associated with high estrogen and low testosterone. It is possible, however, that these low levels of testosterone and high levels of estradiol occurred in response to the heart attack itself.14

Estrogen and Prostate Cancer
The role that estrogen plays in malignant prostate disease is contradictory and complex. Some studies indicate that estrogen and its toxic metabolites are a cause of prostate cancer.15,16 Yet once prostate cancer develops, certain estrogen compounds demonstrate anticancer effects.

This paradox can be explained by the mechanisms that estradiol (and its toxic metabolites) uses to damage prostate cell DNA,17 causing gene mutations that result in the loss of cell growth regulatory control, i.e. cancer. Interestingly, once a prostate tumor manifests, estrogen may exert anti-tumor effects, though cancer cells eventually become resistant to estrogen drugs and then even use endogenous estrogen to fuel their growth.

The fact that estrogen may temporarily exert anti-tumor effects in certain types of prostate cancer cells does not diminish the argument that estrogen may have contributed to the initiation of the same cancer. For example, in a study published two years ago, researchers discovered that when ***8220;estradiol is added to testosterone treatment of rats, prostate cancer incidence is markedly increased and even a short course of estrogen treatment results in a high incidence of prostate cancer.***8221; These scientists hypothesize that metabolites of estrogens can be converted to reactive intermediates that can adduct to DNA and cause generation of reactive oxygen species; thus, estradiol is a weak DNA-damaging carcinogen that causes DNA damage to prostate cell genes.18 This kind of damage to DNA regulatory genes is what initiates prostate cancer.

Many published studies, however, show no association between high blood estradiol levels and diagnosed prostate cancers.19 One reason there are not more diagnosed prostate cancers in men with high estrogen may be that the high estradiol level that initiated DNA damage then serves to keep prostate cancer temporarily under control once it develops.

An interesting mechanism by which certain prostate cancer cells become resistant to estradiol therapy is the development of components in cancer cells that selectively remove estradiol from the tumor cells. If our normal cells were only as adaptive as cancer cells, we could possibly become biologically immortal.

Another reason why estradiol blood levels may not correlate with prostate cancer incidence is the ability of prostate cells to produce their own estradiol (by making their own aromatase enzyme). Although evidence is conflicting, there is a clear indication that local synthesis of estrogen in the prostate gland itself may be significant in prostate tumor development.16 All of this helps validate the importance of nutrients Life Extension male members take to block the carcinogenic effects of estrogen within the prostate gland.

An analogy to how excess estrogen can first damage DNA regulatory genes to cause cancer and then act as a prostate cancer suppressor can be seen with chemotherapy drugs. The mechanism by which most chemo drugs kill cancer cells is to inflict massive damage to cellular DNA. While chemo drugs kill cancer cells, they simultaneously damage healthy DNA and can increase the risk of future cancers. It appears that excess estrogen damages prostate cell DNA to initiate cancer, but then acts as a temporary prostate cancer suppressor. In presenting this analogy, I am not implying that estrogen in men is as dangerous as toxic chemo drugs. I am showing that something that suppresses cancer cell propagation (like estrogen) can also cause cancer.

Our Observations
Our Observations
We at Life Extension have often observed aged men with symptom-free prostate cancer who have startlingly high estradiol levels. It requires a needle biopsy to confirm these slow growing tumors that were identified by only modestly high PSA levels. In fact, we often look at aging men***8217;s estradiol and free testosterone blood levels as a potential indicator of prostate cancer. Aging men with low free testosterone and high estradiol often have prostate cancer based on these observations. Many of these men, however, will die from vascular disease (possibly caused by their high estrogen levels) before their prostate cancer is diagnosed.

In fact, a study published just this year discusses potential initiating effect of estrogens in the development of prostate cancer.15 Tumor initiation is defined by the National Cancer Institute as a process in which normal cells are changed so that they are able to form tumors. Substances that cause cancer can be tumor initiators. The latest study on this subject suggests that estrogen is a prostate cancer initiator and that anti-estrogen therapies might be an overlooked prevention strategy.

An overlooked reason so many human studies fail to show a relationship between estrogen levels and prostate cancer is the fact that men with the highest estrogen levels may have perished from heart attacks and strokes before prostate cancer had a chance to clinically manifest. Based on the vascular disease risks discussed at the beginning of this article, men who suffered from estrogen overload early in their life would be expected to die sooner and, therefore not live long enough to develop clinically diagnosed prostate cancer. From a statistical standpoint, this would falsely make it appear that higher estradiol levels in aging men do not result in greater incidences of prostate cancer, since many men with the highest estrogen levels would not be alive to even participate in the study.

MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT PROSTATE CANCER

While prostate cancer is not usually diagnosed until men reach older ages, it can be initiated 15-25 years prior to clinical manifestation.20 In fact, there is convincing evidence that the initiating DNA damage inflicted by estrogen to prostate cells can occur before you are even born! Studies show that as early as the second and third trimester of life, exposure to elevated estrogens in the womb can initiate prostate cancer that may not manifest for 80 years.15,21-28

Please don***8217;t feel overly helpless about this, as it requires more than mere initiation for cancer to fully develop. What you eat and other lifestyle factors have an enormous impact on whether you develop prostate cancer, even if you are strongly genetically predisposed.

Estrogen***8217;s Role in Benign Prostate Enlargement
Unlike prostate cancer, estrogen***8217;s role in the development and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is clearly defined. Animal studies initially led to the hypothesis that estrogens can stimulate prostate growth, resulting in hyperplasia of the gland. A large body of subsequent human research confirms the initial findings.15,20,29-32

Estrogen stimulates proliferation of the stromal cells in the prostate gland that cause so many of the urinary discomforts associated with BPH. A study published just this year documents a specific mechanism by which estradiol causes rapid proliferation of prostate stromal cells.15

Estrogen***8217;s Role in Benign Prostate Enlargement
Another study also published this year provides further clarification on how estradiol increases the proliferation of stromal cells and how anti-estrogen compounds block this undesirable effect. The researchers concluded that ***8220;***8230;these findings support the hypothesis that estrogens play a role in the pathogenesis of BPH, a disease characterized predominantly by stromal overgrowth.***8221;20

In a study published last year, researchers evaluated the association of sex hormone levels in the blood with common BPH urinary tract symptoms. Study subjects consisted of 260 men, 60 years of age or older, whose blood levels of testosterone, estradiol, and other sex hormones were measured. Of these men, 128 cases had two to four symptoms (excessive urination at night, hesitancy, incomplete emptying, and weak stream). The 132 men in the control group had no urinary symptoms. Adjustments were made for age, race/ethnicity, waist circumference, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity.33

The results showed that BPH sufferers had statistically significantly greater estradiol concentrations than symptom-free controls. Men suffering from BPH symptoms also had higher levels of a marker for a metabolite for dihydrotestosterone (DHT, another documented factor in the development of BPH). After multivariate adjustments, men with the greater estradiol concentration had a 1.78 times higher incidence of urinary tract symptoms. An even greater incidence of urinary tract symptoms occurred in men with the highest levels of a dihydrotestosterone metabolite, whereas blood testosterone level showed no effect on urinary tract symptoms. The doctors who conducted this study concluded by stating, ***8220;in this cross-sectional study representative of older US men, circulating AAG, a metabolite of dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol were associated with an increased risk of having lower urinary tract symptoms.***8221;33

These findings, reported over the past 18 months confirm what Life Extension told its members back in 1994 about estrogen***8217;s role in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The encouraging news is that most Life Extension male members are already taking nutrients (and in some cases drugs like Arimidex® and Avodart®) that exhibit anti-estrogen and anti-DHT properties in the prostate gland itself. This is important because even when estrogen and DHT are lowered in the blood, prostate cells can compensate by synthesizing them in the prostate gland.

this is from lef.org
 
Last edited:
Back
Top