maybe people should add how many weeks they were injecting to get a more accurate assumption.
eg my levels were ****ng/dL from injecting 500mg @ week 8
because obviously there will be a fair difference if you get tested from week 2 or 3 compared to week 7 or 8. would it be safe to say results taken around week 7 +/- could be considered close to peak levels?
lol dude apollon that means if you ran 800mgs of test your levels would be around 6200ng/dl... and if kazmir ran 800 his would be 4266.... I am starting to think a lot of guys never get as big as the pro's because they are like holly shit I need to run 3 grams of test to get this big. But a pro would get the same test levels with only like 1 gram because he has pharmacy grade stuff. So maybe a lot of guys are being held back by thinking they are running a lot more than they actually are.
on 160 mg/week of T...I was 43.3 nmol/L = 1248 nd/dl
forget how many days from the shot it was....I think like 3 days from shot if I remember right.
On 200 test I was @ >1500
If that helps![]()
300 mgs per wk has me at 1530 (on trt)...
On 250 test E a week I was at >1500. My lab would not give me the exact numbers.
on 1000mg sus i was >52 nmol. 3 days after injection
sorry lab caps out at 52 nmol lol
Sorry MS, but it's true my man. Quoted posts below as it is an easy demonstration on how different we are:
I tend to land around 900-1025ng/dL at 250mg/wk, which as you can see is quite different from the folks above. I'm still trying to learn why this is, but the best I can do so far in explaining it is 1. Body mass has a direct relationship with the amount of hormone needed. 2. Some folks are "hyper-excreters", which means they basically metabolize the hormones faster than others and need higher doses to counter this. 3. Some folks are hyper-sensitive to hormones, and require FAR less to see the same results.
I do plan on getting my results posted here from Pinn's new batch when I get them back (waiting on requisition atm), which is going to have some pretty numbers I'm hoping, but it won't be 10,000 like Heavyiron posted on his awhile ago due to this difference in physiology.
In short: Everyone's Different~
Sorry MS, but it's true my man. Quoted posts below as it is an easy demonstration on how different we are:
I tend to land around 900-1025ng/dL at 250mg/wk, which as you can see is quite different from the folks above. I'm still trying to learn why this is, but the best I can do so far in explaining it is 1. Body mass has a direct relationship with the amount of hormone needed. 2. Some folks are "hyper-excreters", which means they basically metabolize the hormones faster than others and need higher doses to counter this. 3. Some folks are hyper-sensitive to hormones, and require FAR less to see the same results.
I do plan on getting my results posted here from Pinn's new batch when I get them back (waiting on requisition atm), which is going to have some pretty numbers I'm hoping, but it won't be 10,000 like Heavyiron posted on his awhile ago due to this difference in physiology.
In short: Everyone's Different~