I've seen some great diet advice here and have actually changed my eating habits based on advice here. Thanks for all the great information.
But, I have a basic diet question. Please don't flame me, I see a lot of great diet information, but I've never had it explained WHY higher or lower protein diets are helpful. When I was in college it was explained to me that a calorie is a calorie is a calorie.. it all breaks down to glucose where it is either used or then repackaged in to glycogen and eventually fat.
So, by way of illustrating my question. Suppose there were 3 clones on 3 diets of 5000 calories a day and suppose they wanted to put on muscle mass.
Clone 1: 20/60/20 (protein/carbs/fat)
Clone 2: 50/30/20
Clone 3: IV drip of glucose, doesn't eat food.
All 3 clones are on vitamins and nutritional supplements as needed and are identical in every way besides diet. I realize natural vitamins and nutrients may be easier to absorb than supplements, but I am under the impression it isn't that big a deal. And, I realize that "good" food seems more filling and junk food makes it easier to go over your target caloric intake, but let's assume all 3 clones hit 5000 exactly each day.
If all 3 have identical workout plans and all 3 have identical caloric intakes, will there actually be a large difference in the muscle gains?
I am curious to know why calories from protein seem to facilitate muscle gains more than calories from other sources? Don't they all break down to the same thing before the body uses them?
Thanks in advance. This is my first post here so be kind! And thanks for all the awesome info here.. I've already changed my diet and workouts, and I assume there is a legitimate answer to this question, and am curious to hear thoughts.
But, I have a basic diet question. Please don't flame me, I see a lot of great diet information, but I've never had it explained WHY higher or lower protein diets are helpful. When I was in college it was explained to me that a calorie is a calorie is a calorie.. it all breaks down to glucose where it is either used or then repackaged in to glycogen and eventually fat.
So, by way of illustrating my question. Suppose there were 3 clones on 3 diets of 5000 calories a day and suppose they wanted to put on muscle mass.
Clone 1: 20/60/20 (protein/carbs/fat)
Clone 2: 50/30/20
Clone 3: IV drip of glucose, doesn't eat food.
All 3 clones are on vitamins and nutritional supplements as needed and are identical in every way besides diet. I realize natural vitamins and nutrients may be easier to absorb than supplements, but I am under the impression it isn't that big a deal. And, I realize that "good" food seems more filling and junk food makes it easier to go over your target caloric intake, but let's assume all 3 clones hit 5000 exactly each day.
If all 3 have identical workout plans and all 3 have identical caloric intakes, will there actually be a large difference in the muscle gains?
I am curious to know why calories from protein seem to facilitate muscle gains more than calories from other sources? Don't they all break down to the same thing before the body uses them?
Thanks in advance. This is my first post here so be kind! And thanks for all the awesome info here.. I've already changed my diet and workouts, and I assume there is a legitimate answer to this question, and am curious to hear thoughts.