4 weeks of tbol too little?

AntM1564

New member
I have my second cycle in place, a longer run of test e at 600mg. I am curious about tbol though. Would a first time user see any benefits at running it at 50mg for 4 weeks at the beginning of a cycle, or should the dose be higher for a longer time? I've been poking around and I've read that after 4 or 5 weeks it loses its effectiveness and other things I have read said to run for 6-8 weeks.
 
It s not as toxic or prone to conversion to estro as dbol but I think 4 weeks at 50 is fine.

Thanks for the response.

My second cycle was going to be test e for 16 weeks at 600mg with eq for 14 weeks at 600mg. I'e read mix things about eq, but I won't know how I respond unless I try it. Now, I'm debating whether or not to drop the eq and and tbol at the beginning instead. From what I've read, more people seem to respond better to tbol than eq. They both fit my current goal for the cycle which is why I have the dilemma now.

I do not want to run all three because I do not have experience with two of the compounds. It would be hard to determine what I respond to and what I don't respond to by adding in two unknown things at the same time. Opinions versus the two cycles?
 
I like EQ better than Tbol. Both slow, quality mass builders...but EQ gives me good vascularity and a hardy appetite.

Opinion only.
 
I like them both together ;)

But as far as four weeks Tbol, definitely do-able bit I usually run mine min 6-8wks.

I really love eq-like Jolier said, vascularity and appetite are amazing but it takes a long time time kick in. Tbol I feel the first week, hardness and pumps beyond belief, only it actually supresses my appetite for some reason.
 
Back
Top