tury694
Pale Gorilla
28lbs in 8 weeks roush doesn't seem healthy at all. You gotta be doing something wrong bud..
Dbol bloat.
28lbs in 8 weeks roush doesn't seem healthy at all. You gotta be doing something wrong bud..
order more, simpleI will run out of Prop well before I run out of my Tren. My question is, can I continue using up the Tren without stacking with Test?
28lbs in 8 weeks roush doesn't seem healthy at all. You gotta be doing something wrong bud..
Dbol bloat.
I'm taking 40 mg per day right now.. feel pretty damn good all the way around (compared to how I felt pre cycle).. I'm also taking Proviron though too,, and that is a positive mood and libido enhancer as well. So I can't pin point if its the Dbol for sure or not,, but the 28 pounds of weight gain over the last 8 weeks is definitely something the Dbol has helped with.
The only negative I'm experiencing right now is from the NPP-- claustrophobia, trouble breathing-- I feel strong in the gym and the nandrolone is definitely kicked in.. but every time with deca/npp when it starts kicking in I get those two negative sides.
So what about other hormone-driven systems that actually look for the testosterone molecule like the thyroid, pancreas, adrenals? Testosterone is much more than an anabolic hormone to us men; it really is a pretty integral part of a machine.
Not busting your balls btw, I still see DOCTORS stating this kind of stuff, which blows my mind.
Hey halfwit - I'm not sure about the "hormone-driven systems that actually look for the testosterone molecule like the thyroid, pancreas, adrenals?"
The tren only cycles is something I've read about - so double checked before posting this and found if you were to run a tren only cycle
you are best to at least add dbol or anadrol... or even winsterol - with these three falling in to the Class II category.
It looks like the worst effect of trenbolone only cycle - is the libido (so it seems)... however, dbol seems to correct the libido because of an androgen,
same as test.
I haven't had the chance to challenge this concept from every angle - so I'm still a bit skeptical, and is why I've ended the post with...
"I still recommend having test in the cycle."
The dbol theory, is what I've read from Bill Roberts.
The theory of tren with no test - the problem wouldn't be the lack of testosterone... but the lack of estrogen.
Now, with dbol and tren - there is no need for testosterone, as these two would cover
all your basis for activity of androgen steroids.
Aromatization of Dianabol will satisfy the need for a normal degree of estrogenic activity.
This gives you a "Class I" and "Class II" steroid stack.
Trenbolone gives you the "Class I" steroid - which combines to the androgen receptor.
Dbol is your "Class II" steroid - and does not bind to the androgen receptor.
However... "I still recommend having test in the cycle."
Ok, so here's my question for you: if a hormone (androgen) doesn't bind to a receptor, how does the body use it? A TON of the old school line of reasoning has been proven false time and time again. To illustrate, dianabol was going to be widely used for TRT as most thought we only needed a source of androgens, and an aromatizing androgen would be optimal. Problem is that the body is smarter than we give it credit for, and certain problems with insulin resistance/hypothyroidism/cortisol imbalance can definitely happen.
I'm not claiming that I know everything or am never wrong, but I'm still pretty sure that test needs to remain the base of any cycle. Can folks get away with it? Sure. But why half-ass something?