Double Dose Front Loading VS Ester Bait N' Switch Kicker

[sn0rt]

Opening up for discussion.

What are your opinions on Double Dose Front Loading Vs Ester Bait N' Switch Kicker?

What do you feel is more beneficial?
Pros/Cons?
etc..

Simple Test "Double Dose Front Load" protocol example:
Weeks
(1) Test E/C @ 1000mg @ 500mg BW (Mon/Thurs)
(2-12) Test E/C @ 500 mg @ 250mg BW (Mon/Thurs)
*Speeds the build-up of Test to take advantage of fresh receptors

Simple Test "Ester Bait N' Switch Kicker" protocol example:
Weeks
(1-3) Test P @ 100mg EOD
(1-12)Test E/C @ 500mg @ 250 mg BW (Mon/Thurs)
*Kick-starts the run with a fast acting ester to take advantage of fresh receptors during initial weeks while long acting esters are building up.

Or even
(1-3) Test P @ 100mg EOD
(1-12)Test E/C @500 mg @ 250mg BW (Mon/Thurs)
(13-14)Test P @ 100mg EOD
*This option takes advantage of the suppression to keep Test levels high while waiting to start post cycle therapy (pct) two weeks after Test E/C dose.

Let the learning begin!

 

[sn0rt]

bump

 

[sn0rt]

bump

 

[sn0rt]

Heh, I guess I need more posts to get a good response from this board huh?

 

[SicVic]

This is awesome. I'm surprised noone commented on this one

 

[SolomonGrundy]

i like option 2 the rapid start method, for me large front loads cause terrible anxiety and sweats, not fun , but regular test C with some prop to speed up first few weeks sounds good

I dont see any advantage to the option C, just a larger drop when you go cold turkey

 

[stronglats]

and where are now pundits -experts on duty ?

 

[gymrat19]

a+b combined Test doesn't kick around the 5-6th week for me . Well, by kick I mean in full force