I <3 sQuaTs
NationalFigureCompetitor
youve been giving out some good advice here.. but i disagree with the above statement..
a 40/40/20 is best for growing.. 15% protein?? how so?? where do u get this philosophy from??
Cited from a book called Sport Nutrition for Health and Performance (Manore, 2009) used for my Nutrition for Athletic Performance class. Actual ranges suggested are 12-15% PRO, 45-65% CHO and 25-35% FAT.
The idea behind it is that 15% pro is adequate to assist lean tissue gain and maintain a positive nitrogen balance, while a higher percentage of carbs will still provide as a source of excess energy needed for weight gain (for the same kcal/g), but keeping fat within a healthy range.
Another interesting point is that there is supporting evidence that there is no additional benefit to protein synthesis in amounts higher than 2.0 g/kg and benefits can be seen at as little as 1.33 g/kg. So if you're saying he should take in 3500 kcal/day and 15% is pro (132g) then it is roughly 1.33 g/kg (131g). As I stated, this would be a starting point (for a goal of 220lbs) but if more weight gain is desired then calories would be increased and therefore, higher protein intake. I don't know about you, but I would rather eat another slice of bread than another piece of chicken
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"
40/40/20 is a very well accepted and popular method, but this is an alternative to try. But you did call me out, I shouldn't have used the word "typical", because it is not.