its Ruhl tyme

Ruhl would've got M.O 2004 if Coleman never competed this year. the thing with Ruhl is his muscle seperation isnt as good as Coleman's, plus Coleman is way too huge compared to Ruhl. the guy is on gear day n night.some of 'em that i dont even know of. Coleman's kidney is probably a size of a quarter, and he sure isnt living long enuff. lol
 
LethalJin said:
Coleman is way too huge compared to Ruhl. the guy is on gear day n night.some of 'em that i dont even know of. Coleman's kidney is probably a size of a quarter, and he sure isnt living long enuff. lol
Ahhh where do you get your info from?
Bone structure wise Ruhl Is far larger than Coleman,if you don,t believe me look at the erliest pics of these two guys before they where even competing on a national level.Sure Coleman has 20 some odd pounds on Ruhl he does not look that much larger.
Kidney the size of a quarter....?Are you for real?
Your brain is compiled of lint ...thats for sure
 
i meant liver not kidney. mybad
havent seen either one of em in person. i did take a look @ their old skool pics. Ruhl is big boned.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top