Barry Bonds broke the MLB home run record in 2001 with 73 HR. My question is how many HR do you think Bonds would have hit without steroids? My answer is 45. Btw I am experienced with steroids (dianabol, winstrol, test e in particular.) My personal opinion is that the mainstream media under reports the performance enhancing magnitude of steroids.
Question
- Thread starter jb777
- Start date
MotorIHead
New member
Who cares ? Ur posting this is the wrong section anyhow. I don't even think there is a section for this stupid question.
JamieOleBoy
Yeah Buddy!!!
Lol
MotorIHead
New member
That's a good way to get a nice little time out....
scotimusprime
Setting NEWB Gun to KILL
ya this is a retarded OT question. the saying"there is no stupid questions....." does not apply to this thread
Polynikes666
Dances with sheep
Damn, guys! Take it easy!
MotorIHead
New member
ROTFL ! U seriously made me laugh out loud. Thanks bro !
snigg
That Dude
Greazy-Pickle
Senior Member
lmao @ doogie fucking howser..
ill answer the stupid question.. steroids do not make you hit homeruns.. they may help a little bit in hitting the ball further but not much, maybe 20ft.. (trust me i know) so you would have to look at how many of his homeruns barely made it over and they would be the only ones you could deduct.. if he hit a 500ft homerun on juice (tren was his preference) without it, it wouldve went about 475ft.. which is still way out of any field.. the main reason baseball players use steroids is for endurance and drive.. playing baseball everyday and traveling 2wice a week gets old real quick and wears you out.. a little motivation never hurt any1.. most athletic (not barry bonds) baseball players choose gentle steroids primo,var,nandro.. lazy homerun hitters go with the big dogs tren,drol,test.. strength is all their after and they dont mind the added weight because there only playing 1st base,right field etc..
Last edited:
Similar threads
