are you saying thats a nice mild cycle, or are you saying thats too short to run cyp?
I wouldn't really consider a 10 week cycle "short". Also I have seen guys have great results with this length of a cycle, and it seems like the further over 10 weeks you go, the greater the odds are of having some negative sides.
I would run it 14 to 16 weeks and 500 to 600 test cyp.
not really. The only prob with long long runs and I mean long runs of gear can cause permanent shutdown. The difference between say 10 weeks to 14 as far as sides isn't gonna change. But week 10-14 you'll be in beast mode on your cycle and could accomplish a lot of gains.I wouldn't really consider a 10 week cycle "short". Also I have seen guys have great results with this length of a cycle, and it seems like the further over 10 weeks you go, the greater the odds are of having some negative sides.
hahaha ok champ, no need to be a dick. You can have your opinions and I will have mine. I have put in considerable amounts of research, and maybe you have too. Their is no way to know for sure so chill out ya friggin grump.
Yes and OBVIOUSLY the longer the cycle the greater the risk of sides. Anyone who has done any actual research (ie looking up pros AND cons) will tell you this. That is why I would keep my cycle at 10 weeks. I personally don't like to permanently damage myself, but hey if you good for you bro.
you guys are hilarious. All I am saying is that I like the idea of doing a 10 week cycle because it is a good balance between gains and the potential for sides. I respect all your opinions and experiences, and I am glad that longer cycles have worked well for you.
I understand your saying that if I have already done a 10 week cycle I should just push it out to 12-14 weeks because the increase in sides are not that much more likely for just an extra couple of weeks. However to counter your point I have also read many threads where guys state they start to get sides when they push past the 10 week mark.