Risk of damaging HPTA?

^^^^agreed

Everytime you run a cycle you risk the chance of damaging the hpta.
 
Yes. Running test c and it will kick in at around week 4. What's that give you? Roughly 6 weeks. Run that shit at least 12 weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OX
I wouldn't really consider a 10 week cycle "short". Also I have seen guys have great results with this length of a cycle, and it seems like the further over 10 weeks you go, the greater the odds are of having some negative sides.

This is because you don't have the knowledge or experience to know any better. Run a decent cycle and you would understand.
 
I wouldn't really consider a 10 week cycle "short". Also I have seen guys have great results with this length of a cycle, and it seems like the further over 10 weeks you go, the greater the odds are of having some negative sides.
not really. The only prob with long long runs and I mean long runs of gear can cause permanent shutdown. The difference between say 10 weeks to 14 as far as sides isn't gonna change. But week 10-14 you'll be in beast mode on your cycle and could accomplish a lot of gains.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OX
hahaha ok champ, no need to be a dick. You can have your opinions and I will have mine. I have put in considerable amounts of research, and maybe you have too. Their is no way to know for sure so chill out ya friggin grump.

I wasnt trying to be a Dick, I was just stating the obvious. As far as research goes well you can do all the research you want but until you actually run a decent cycle you will never REALLY know. The longer the cycle the more your body adjusts to the extra weight. In not going to explain how a long cycle is better then a short but i will give you a starting point so you can do your research....

Research homeostasis in and out and that will give you a better understanding of your own body and how it works
 
Yes and OBVIOUSLY the longer the cycle the greater the risk of sides. Anyone who has done any actual research (ie looking up pros AND cons) will tell you this. That is why I would keep my cycle at 10 weeks. I personally don't like to permanently damage myself, but hey if you good for you bro.

Your still not getting it. One shot of exogenous test provides a chance for permanent shut down. As far as sides go, if your that worried about them then you shouldn't cycle in the first place. Your basing all of your decisions on potential sides that you don't even know if you would get or not. Sides don't really get any worse for me until the 20 week mark and its not exponentially worse to where I need to come off. Stop being an ignoramous for a minute and listen to some real life experience. If thats to hard for you to do then I'm aftaid you have already failed in this game.
 
you guys are hilarious. All I am saying is that I like the idea of doing a 10 week cycle because it is a good balance between gains and the potential for sides. I respect all your opinions and experiences, and I am glad that longer cycles have worked well for you.

I understand your saying that if I have already done a 10 week cycle I should just push it out to 12-14 weeks because the increase in sides are not that much more likely for just an extra couple of weeks. However to counter your point I have also read many threads where guys state they start to get sides when they push past the 10 week mark.

This made me laugh! If you keep getting your advice from inexperienced individuals you won't grow your knowledge base beyond that of an inexperienced individual yourself. Keep doing your tiny cycles and keep your tiny gains. We tried to help you see the big picture but narrow minded people don't have the depth for that i guess.
 
Back
Top