I've been a lurker for some time but decided to join the discussions.
First thing I would like to talk about with you guys is regarding the pursue of having stable blood levels of steroids to ensure less sides, better outcomes, or so its said.
For example, many argue that test prop gives less sides being injected EOD , but according to this site ***. not allowed***/ , test prop fluctuates a lot (50 mg EOD of test prop varies a lot in comparison with test enanthate at 50 mg) - attached images.
Personal experience, I do experience less sides with test prop even though it fluctuates a lot in my system given EOD injections and get more sides (like acne) with test enanthate -more stable . One half assed theory is that stable blood levels are able to "ticke" the AR in a constant way, being able to produce side effects more so than with less stable blood levels.
Also ,from what I've gathered, endogenous test fluctuates a lot too, so what is it with this 'keeping blood levels stable" approach being desirable ?
First thing I would like to talk about with you guys is regarding the pursue of having stable blood levels of steroids to ensure less sides, better outcomes, or so its said.
For example, many argue that test prop gives less sides being injected EOD , but according to this site ***. not allowed***/ , test prop fluctuates a lot (50 mg EOD of test prop varies a lot in comparison with test enanthate at 50 mg) - attached images.
Personal experience, I do experience less sides with test prop even though it fluctuates a lot in my system given EOD injections and get more sides (like acne) with test enanthate -more stable . One half assed theory is that stable blood levels are able to "ticke" the AR in a constant way, being able to produce side effects more so than with less stable blood levels.
Also ,from what I've gathered, endogenous test fluctuates a lot too, so what is it with this 'keeping blood levels stable" approach being desirable ?
Last edited by a moderator: