against_grain
New member
While doing research I have begun to specifically compare Test Prop and Test En, as these are two of the common esters. I believe that there may be a KEY difference that many people have not considered.
Lets compare results vs HPTA shutdown time on a 12 week cycle:
Tets Enanthate:
week 1-4: levels building, hpta shutdown but no results.
week 5: partial saturation
week 5-12: fully saturated
week 13-15: levels dropping
week 16: post cycle therapy (pct)
In total we have a total of seven weeks at peak levels. Eight weeks where we would have total HPTA shutdown with less than full results of being ON.
A total 15 weeks from start to post cycle therapy (pct) with 7 of those at top test levels, and with 8 weeks at either building test levels, declining levels, or some other level that's NOT peak test level.
With the same 12 weeks cycle of test Prop we would have:
Weeks 1-12 at peak test levels, week 13 would be declining levels, and starting post cycle therapy (pct) on week 14. Prop has T levels up to ON cycle levels by the second day.
The same 12 week cycle resulting in only 1 week where there would be less than Peak Test levels!!
I think that given a cycle of the same length that Test Prop would result in Faster results, LESS time spent in HPTA shutdown, quicker start to post cycle therapy (pct).
Thoughts?
Lets compare results vs HPTA shutdown time on a 12 week cycle:
Tets Enanthate:
week 1-4: levels building, hpta shutdown but no results.
week 5: partial saturation
week 5-12: fully saturated
week 13-15: levels dropping
week 16: post cycle therapy (pct)
In total we have a total of seven weeks at peak levels. Eight weeks where we would have total HPTA shutdown with less than full results of being ON.
A total 15 weeks from start to post cycle therapy (pct) with 7 of those at top test levels, and with 8 weeks at either building test levels, declining levels, or some other level that's NOT peak test level.
With the same 12 weeks cycle of test Prop we would have:
Weeks 1-12 at peak test levels, week 13 would be declining levels, and starting post cycle therapy (pct) on week 14. Prop has T levels up to ON cycle levels by the second day.
The same 12 week cycle resulting in only 1 week where there would be less than Peak Test levels!!
I think that given a cycle of the same length that Test Prop would result in Faster results, LESS time spent in HPTA shutdown, quicker start to post cycle therapy (pct).
Thoughts?
