Makes good sense.. I appreciate the input from both you guys. AAS is definitely addicting and so far its my favorite drug I've ever used. But I guess if a guy gets too far into it its not much different than a meth head and just ruins himself over time, so.. And makes a lot of sense about the loss of gains myth (which I honestly believe it can be avoided if cycles are done properly) but let me clarify. If my genetic potential allows me to bench around 405 lbs, and with a cycle I reach a new 1rm of 450 lbs. the same with squat, curls, deadlifts etc, theoretically during my off time I could maintain these gains while not increasing the 1rm I achieved during cycle until next cycle then possibly gain even more? So like an inch worm the aas allows for more gains above genetic potential.. on cycle + 5 lbs off cycle maintain on cycle +5 lbs off cycle maintain etc. right?
Is there such thing as genetic freaks? I mean, I want to look like friggin Arnold in the next 3-5 years. I have similar natural build other than I am shorter. This probably sounds like an unrealistic expectation but you cant be afraid to fail. gotta dig deep and give it all you can if you want something bad enough.
Whos the lucky sons of Btchs that get a sponsor and a team of doctors and trainers these days??
Not sure I'd go as far as comparing hormones to amphetamines or other recreational drugs. After all, I can't say I've ever heard of someone sucking a dick for a pin of testosterone.
Define genetic potential. I personally view it as the mass you can sustain with appropriate caloric intake and stimulation at your own production of testosterone/growth hormone/etc.
Exceed this value, and sure - it doesn't make sense that you can maintain it off cycle. The problem with this is that how do you know what this limit is? Training for multiple years can help, but at what point do you call it a max? It's easy to see guys that have traps on their traps and make that's assessment, but they never come off either. Add to this the fact that anyone that has spent enough time in the lifestyle will tell you - your work is NEVER done.
I guess the closest I can explain the difference between being on and not, is you recover much faster and the weight becomes easier (to a point) to move properly. You might set new max weight achievements, but there will be a decrease when you come off. Going by a 1rm is tricky because that's the absolute best you could do under very specific circumstances that you may not be able to achieve again unless you meet those circumstances again.
Can you meet a 405 1rm and duplicate it off cycle? Maybe. But if you can't, that doesn't mean you somehow are losing mass, and need to hop back on immediately. Heck, there are days where my sleep was lacking, or diet was off, and I have to decrease weight - even while on. I could probably force it up, and injure myself, but that doesn't do anything for me in the long-term.
It's all about those long-term goals brother. You mention obtaining a specific press at a specific weight; stick at this long enough, and you'll meet that goal as long as it's reasonable. If you're pressing 365 now for reps, it's just a matter of time before that 405 is not only doable, but repeatable. Just comes down to when.
Besides, if your long-term goal is to have a physique similar to Ahhhnold, you need to stop focusing on weight altogether. I'm very guilty of this as it feels good to see five 45lb plates on a bar, then reach for a sixth. But if that really isn't what's going to build up those pecs (density vs size), why push for that in the first place? Focus on the movements, learn to control those muscles with your mind, enable your body to contract so tightly at the end of a rep, that you swear you're going to rip through your skin.
That's how you'll put on size. Yes, that (for the most part) does stay as long as everything else is met. Eat right, train smart, sleep well, and as long as you're not hormone deficient - you'll keep most of the muscles you worked hard for.
Genetics matter when you're already at the top, competing with guys that have every advantage you do, but have been bestowed gifts by mommy nature to have better tie ins, respond better to the drugs, don't suffer negative sides, and just seem to grow no matter what. It's not fair, but that's just how it is. I'll never take home an Olympia Sandow; I know that while I have the determination to push just as hard, I'm a foot taller than most of these guys and I will need to be twice as big to have the same appearance. So I accept that, train hard, and will be happy to be the best version of ME. If you know deep down that this holds true for you, there's nothing wrong with it. It doesn't mean you've given up, it just means that you know you're not Arnold Schwarzenegger.
In my experience, folks that have a team have money to begin with, or have achieved a level of notoriety before they got to that point - attracting the types to help them progress. It's like seeing this 22 year old kid pull up to my gym in cars that cost more than my house. He didn't earn it, he just happened to have been born into it.
Doesn't mean I have to like him though. .
I realize I'm all over the place in my reply, but hopefully I answered some of your questions and gave you food for thought. Master the diet and training, and the drugs are just icing on the cake - they're just a tool, nothing more.