I have a very specific question about the various "adjunct" medications used alongside testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) -- for example aromatase inhibitors. First, a little background.
My symptoms are ADD-ish fogginess, lack of energy, and I'm a bit overweight. I'm 47. A recent lab showed my T level as 316. My doc is recommending I use testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). HOWEVER, this is not the first time. About two years ago, he prescribed cypionate and it did indeed get my levels up to a healthy 800 - 1100. However, despite doing that for about 6 months, I experienced zero subjective benefits. No increase in alertness or energy, and no discernible difference as I worked at the gym. No difference to morning wood either. So I told him I didn't want to do it any more and he agreed. I decided instead to simply work on my weight since I'd heard that being fat can pull down T levels too. I was *very* overweight then, but I've now lost a chunk. No improvement on the T levels though, as the recent lab showed, nor on the energy or fogginess.
Now that first time, *all* I did was the cypionate, but now he's talking about adding aromatase inhibitors and a few other things he mentioned that I didn't pick up on. I really don't mind trying it again, but only if there's a point.
So, here's my question. Notice that when I used it before my T levels did genuinely improve a lot, up to what I assume is a healthy level (800+). So does that not mean that I wouldn't get any benefit from aromatase whatchmacallthems? Isn't the sign showing that AIs could be useful simply the fact that despite using cypionate (or whatever) the person's levels do *not* go up.
But my levels *did* go up. So what's the point of AIs?
What exactly are AIs *for*?
(I hope that's all clear.)
My symptoms are ADD-ish fogginess, lack of energy, and I'm a bit overweight. I'm 47. A recent lab showed my T level as 316. My doc is recommending I use testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). HOWEVER, this is not the first time. About two years ago, he prescribed cypionate and it did indeed get my levels up to a healthy 800 - 1100. However, despite doing that for about 6 months, I experienced zero subjective benefits. No increase in alertness or energy, and no discernible difference as I worked at the gym. No difference to morning wood either. So I told him I didn't want to do it any more and he agreed. I decided instead to simply work on my weight since I'd heard that being fat can pull down T levels too. I was *very* overweight then, but I've now lost a chunk. No improvement on the T levels though, as the recent lab showed, nor on the energy or fogginess.
Now that first time, *all* I did was the cypionate, but now he's talking about adding aromatase inhibitors and a few other things he mentioned that I didn't pick up on. I really don't mind trying it again, but only if there's a point.
So, here's my question. Notice that when I used it before my T levels did genuinely improve a lot, up to what I assume is a healthy level (800+). So does that not mean that I wouldn't get any benefit from aromatase whatchmacallthems? Isn't the sign showing that AIs could be useful simply the fact that despite using cypionate (or whatever) the person's levels do *not* go up.
But my levels *did* go up. So what's the point of AIs?
What exactly are AIs *for*?
(I hope that's all clear.)