6'4 230 I would smash you
i got 40lbs on you.. and guys half my size put me in a pretzel... weight and height is not enough unless skill level is equal6'4 230 I would smash you
i got 40lbs on you.. and guys half my size put me in a pretzel... weight and height is not enough unless skill level is equal
Ok now you no longer deserve any responses you ignorant fuck. Good luck repoing cars for minimum wage faggot.If USMC meant something they wouldn't bomb the shit out of everything before sending them in.
And then when they do go in, if three or four sandmonkeys show up with AKs and RPGs "FALL BACK!!! CALL THE APACHES!!! RUN!!!"
Dre not trying to figgt with yoy. I just thibk b and c is taking the next step towarss ultimate xommitment
Ok I gotta load up on hcg first. We can play cookie too. Whoever nuts on it last has to eat it!Lmao! Willing to share the fun with a?
If USMC meant something they wouldn't bomb the shit out of everything before sending them in.
And then when they do go in, if three or four sandmonkeys show up with AKs and RPGs "FALL BACK!!! CALL THE APACHES!!! RUN!!!"
If USMC meant something they wouldn't bomb the shit out of everything before sending them in.
And then when they do go in, if three or four sandmonkeys show up with AKs and RPGs "FALL BACK!!! CALL THE APACHES!!! RUN!!!"
i told you i have all day long dick head.. you'll just keep coming back and ill keep banning you... i have your ip address retard.. lol
So why does physique development equal level of commitment? Does the fact that I'm an aspiring powerlifter and train my ass off each and every time I'm in the gym not measure my comity net level regardless of my cycling history? Does not the fact that I train through injuries or sickness, oftentimes to my own detriment, mean more to my commitment level than whether I cycle or blast and cruise?
Does one need to blast and cruise for any reason to be committed or does blasting and cruising bc of hypogonadism change the level of comportment since they're cruising for medical reasons? What about the individuals who have enough training and nutritional knowledge that they can get equivalent results with cycles compared to those who blast and cruise bc they can't gain any other way since training and nutrition are horrible? I believe commitment level has absolutely nothing to do with whether you blast and cruise or cycle on and off.
For the sake of a friendly, constructive discussion, I'm gonna reply
buddy gram of tren was spot on, understood my point perfectly.
First off, I'm saying that if you blast and cruise, your level of progress, on BODYBUILDING TERMS, is gonna be far superior to someone who doesn't. That's a fact, it's simple math: if you stay on for more time, you're gonna have more results.
Then, doens't matter if you have hypogonadism or not, you can b&c. Guys on trt for health reasons don;t even begin to compare with guys who are on for the most part of the year, due to BB purposes. Just look a their doses: the highest TRT dose I ever heard is 300mg/wk of test. That's a starting dose for cruising, if you can cruise with less then you should still be blasting, not cruising.
Yes, with cycling and perfect dieting, you COULD get better results than a guy who b&c mindlessly with shit diet and lifting like a pussy (depends on the case and example). BUT, if your diet and training is spot on and you b&c, your results WILL DEFINITELY be better than if you come completely off for more than 4-6 weeks a year.
Again, the commitment I mentioned was in the sense of trying to bring your physique to the highest level possible, and doing whatever it takes to achieve that.
cheers bro
This may be semantics, but I would argue that if you are running supra-physiological testosterone levels that you are not cruising. 98% of guys will be well over 1,200 ng/dl running 300mg/week of testosterone. Sounds like you are calling for blasting and BLASTING.