Why is Drostanolone not considered one of the 'safer' steroids?

arwold

New member
In conjunction with my last thread, Llewlyn's page on 'safe' drugs include the following: testosterone, nandrolone, methenolone, mesterolone, and boldenone.

Why was Drostanolone not included in this list? It has negligible effect on the liver, so I assume it has a greater cardiovascular risk. But it is a DHT-derived compound just like Methenolone, so what makes Drostanolone more risky?
 
i disagree , imo Drostanolone (masteron) is a very safe and clean compound . More safe imo then nandrolone or boldenone which both can drastically increase RBC and HCT , and thus cause a higher degree of risk of stroke
 
Roush s KNOWS and Primo s ..well primo too. Just cuz someone wrote a paper does not make it gospel...maybe the author did not run it..I ve never..but I m to old to try new stuff...ergo I do not comment on stuff I ve never run.

God q though
 
I second that mast is a pretty mild and safer compound...this learned thru experience. It definantly changes a tren run for the better.
 
That guys lacks EXP. its all book notes and half his suggested cycles if not most I consider something a noob would put together... BUT its a good reference book and to then further look into things.
the use for me was pretty much just the basics of aas and the pics IMO
having said that I think mast is a great mild compound. if hairloss is an issue then maybe that you would notice but other than that sides are minimal IMO and it stacks GREAT with test, bulking OR cutting.
I think mast is underrated sadly (and EQ way over rated)
 
Back
Top