I would like to start off by stating that it is ever obvious that the medical community, although getting better, seems to lack a good understanding of testosterone. And unfortunately because of this, many men have to suffer- I can't tell you how many posts I have read that detail an experience of going to their doctor with blood work indicating low-normal T (and I'm talking within 50ng/dl) and the doctor refusing treatment, despite having many symptoms suggesting low T. And right now I am going to demonstrate why the "normal" range of testosterone is in fact not normal at all.
It seems almost obvious that men are not what they once were. We are a far cry from what our great grandfathers were, whether we want to believe it or not. But why is this? Why are men less hairy than 40 years ago, have a much higher prevalence of gynecomastia etc? Well, it is because testosterone levels are dropping with each generation and there are countless amounts of environmental estrogens that we're exposed to daily to blame for this. Whether it's the estrogen-pumped chickens to produce increased breast growth so those raising them are more profitable, or the water we drink which is contaminated with all the birth control women take, or the produce we eat which is sprayed with pesticides, or the plastics we use every day- we can't escape it. Now, by simply observing men today one can see a comparative difference between men from the 20's, 30's, 40's, but it seems this difference exists in others places- their testosterone levels. There's actually a long-spanning study that shows how testosterone levels in American men has dropped approx 20 % in 20 years. The study ranged from approx 1980 -2000. Now, testosterone levels drop naturally with age, but this is not what is meant. What is meant by a 20% decrease, and what the study shows is, a 60 yo man in 2000 has, on average, 20% less testosterone than a 60 yo man from 1980. Incredible! And who's to say how long this has been going on? birth control was introduced in 1950, so has this decrease been going on for this long?
So, why is this important? Well, here's the main reason. To determine normal ranges of a certain hormone, or anything really, levels are determined from a group of individuals and we calculate where 95 % of the population falls, because it is assumed that 95% of the population is healthy. This is exactly how the normal ranges of testosterone were determined. However, as the study mentioned above indicates, testosterone levels have been declining for some reason over the years, in fact, it is unknown how long this has been going on. And this is where it is important. If the normal ranges were determined using a group of men who have already experienced this nationwide testosterone decline due to environmental factors, then 100% of the results would be skewed and our normal ranges would be determined by numbers that are in actuality, lower than what normal actually is.
If this is so, that would mean our "normal" range for testosterone is actually WAY off. Maybe our testosterone levels should actually be much higher. Based on the study that indicates a 20% decline over 20 years, who's to say the average man 100 years ago, before all the environmental estrogen exposure, didn't have 40 % higher testosterone than the average man today? But just because the average man today has this lowered level, doesn't mean it's actually normal. If we take the average of 95% or so of the population to determine the normal level, but 100 % of the population's testosterone has been decreasing since the introduction of environmental estrogens, that 95% considered normal, is actually lower than what it would be, say 100 years ago. So our "normal" levels are actually based on skewed results.
It seems almost obvious that men are not what they once were. We are a far cry from what our great grandfathers were, whether we want to believe it or not. But why is this? Why are men less hairy than 40 years ago, have a much higher prevalence of gynecomastia etc? Well, it is because testosterone levels are dropping with each generation and there are countless amounts of environmental estrogens that we're exposed to daily to blame for this. Whether it's the estrogen-pumped chickens to produce increased breast growth so those raising them are more profitable, or the water we drink which is contaminated with all the birth control women take, or the produce we eat which is sprayed with pesticides, or the plastics we use every day- we can't escape it. Now, by simply observing men today one can see a comparative difference between men from the 20's, 30's, 40's, but it seems this difference exists in others places- their testosterone levels. There's actually a long-spanning study that shows how testosterone levels in American men has dropped approx 20 % in 20 years. The study ranged from approx 1980 -2000. Now, testosterone levels drop naturally with age, but this is not what is meant. What is meant by a 20% decrease, and what the study shows is, a 60 yo man in 2000 has, on average, 20% less testosterone than a 60 yo man from 1980. Incredible! And who's to say how long this has been going on? birth control was introduced in 1950, so has this decrease been going on for this long?
So, why is this important? Well, here's the main reason. To determine normal ranges of a certain hormone, or anything really, levels are determined from a group of individuals and we calculate where 95 % of the population falls, because it is assumed that 95% of the population is healthy. This is exactly how the normal ranges of testosterone were determined. However, as the study mentioned above indicates, testosterone levels have been declining for some reason over the years, in fact, it is unknown how long this has been going on. And this is where it is important. If the normal ranges were determined using a group of men who have already experienced this nationwide testosterone decline due to environmental factors, then 100% of the results would be skewed and our normal ranges would be determined by numbers that are in actuality, lower than what normal actually is.
If this is so, that would mean our "normal" range for testosterone is actually WAY off. Maybe our testosterone levels should actually be much higher. Based on the study that indicates a 20% decline over 20 years, who's to say the average man 100 years ago, before all the environmental estrogen exposure, didn't have 40 % higher testosterone than the average man today? But just because the average man today has this lowered level, doesn't mean it's actually normal. If we take the average of 95% or so of the population to determine the normal level, but 100 % of the population's testosterone has been decreasing since the introduction of environmental estrogens, that 95% considered normal, is actually lower than what it would be, say 100 years ago. So our "normal" levels are actually based on skewed results.