Winstrol, drinking the injectable?

pittb

New member
Has anyone ever orally taken the injectable form of Winsrtol? I have heard from reputable sources that it can be done. However, does the digestive system breakdown the potency any?
 
If you do a search there's TONS of info on this. Yes it can be done. No it's not as effective. You need almost double the oral dose as injectable to get the same results and it's 10x harder on your liver when taken orally. Just take the plunge and stick it in.
 
50mg of injectable Winstrol,which you will drink, will be same effective as 50mg, which you will take orally in tabs... So,it´s quite expensive.
But if you want to drink it, I recommend 1amp of Winstrol (50mg) morning and 1amp at evening. I have done it in this way a few weeks ago and I was quite satisfied.
If you will stack it with any other drugs, the doses can be lower.
 
First off.... It's probably harder on the liver but it's definatly not 10x as much.... you will need to drink more then you would have shot... Sometimes when I am doing Winstrol (winny) I will get sick of stickin myself (I usually go ED w/ Winny).... If I need a break one day I will just drink the dose down. It's better to stick though bro... however either way is effective
 
I have always injected it. I was just curious about the breakdown of the potency due to the digestive system. The shots don't bother me. Just wanted to try this because of time constraints and because I do it ED. Thanks.
 
Its more effective taken by injection. StonecoldNTO got this article form somewhere on the net:
Got this off of Brock Strasser's column on T - Mag


Q: There's this huge debate raging over whether or not you can "drink" your Winny-V. I know that because stanozolol is 17-AA'ed, I can use it orally. However, how much more or less effective is oral stanozolol over injected stanozolol? I hear that you need about twice as much stanozolol orally as you would injected to see similar results. How was this figure of doubling the dose orally determined?

A: There isn't a lot of great pharmacokinetic data in humans comparing oral to parenteral (injectable) stanozolol. So that idea of "if you use X amount by injection you need twice as much orally" is anecdotal and speculative at best. The best I could find is a study comparing the two methods of administration in dogs. My comments come after the abstract:

The effect of stanozolol on 15-nitrogen retention in the dog

Can J Vet Res 2000 Oct;64(4):246-8 (ISSN: 0830-9000)

Olson ME; Morck DW; Quinn KB [Find other articles with these Authors] Animal Health Unit and Gastrointestinal Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta.

The objective of the study was to determine the influence of either oral or intramuscular administration of stanozolol on nitrogen retention in dogs by using a non-invasive 15N-<a style='text-decoration: none; border-bottom: 3px double;' href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=22&k=amino%20acid" onmouseover="window.status='amino acid'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;">amino acid</a> tracer technique. Ten healthy, intact, adult male sled dogs received either stanozolol tablets, 2 mg/dog PO, q12h, for 25 days (Group 1, n = 5) or an intramuscular injection of 25 mg of stanozolol on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28 (Group 2, n = 5). A 15N amino acid (5.27 mmol) was infused intravenously into each dog on Day 0 (before stanozolol treatment) and on Day 31 (after stanozolol treatment). Urine was collected by catheterization from each animal 3 times daily for 3 consecutive days. The 15N-urea enrichment in urine was determined by high-resolution mass spectrometry and the total amount of urea in the urine was determined.

Both oral and injectable stanozolol resulted in significant (P < 0.05) increases in amino acid nitrogen retention compared to pretreatment values. Oral stanozolol increased nitrogen retention from 29.2 +/- 8.2% to 50.3 +/- 9.2%, while stanozolol injection increased nitrogen retention from 26.6 +/- 9.9% to 67.0 +/- 7.5%. The response to intramuscular administration was significantly greater than the response to the oral dosing regime. Stanozolol increases amino acid nitrogen retention in dogs, as has been previously observed in rats. This action of stanozolol may be beneficial in dogs under stress of surgical trauma and chronic disease.

Okay, so the oral dose was 28mg/week and the injected dose was 25mg/week. And the injected dose was far better at increasing nitrogen retention (67.0% versus 50.3%). This makes it about 33.2% better (roughly speaking), so if I extrapolate, it means to see the same effects as 25mg of injected stanozolol per week, you'd need to take about 38mg of it orally.

This isn't quite "twice the injected dose" and is, in fact, closer to 50% (52% or so actually). So if you assume the dog model is correct, or nearly so in other mammals like humans, you'd need about 50% more stanozolol orally than you would if you injected it. So if you used 50mg of injected Winstrol every other day, it would be a safe bet to assume 37.5mg of stanozolol used orally every day would provide a similar effect.__________________
__________________
 
Thanks, Gator, for the thread. Those kinds of responses are why I read this board. Thanks again.
 
Back
Top