1st Cycle's ..test Only...that's All..

so thats where you get all your info, or maybe you just looked that up on wikipedia too.

Nice response. Still no proof? Mmmm Wonder why, Whose looking stupid now? Bro im always interested in new theories and discussion and the other members above have produced these therories and im interested to know more isnt that what a discussion forum is all about? But you seem to just want to throw down every theory except your own. So stop saying useless responses and start saying why you believe in your theories so we can have an adult debate about them.
 
Nice response. Still no proof? Mmmm Wonder why, Whose looking stupid now? Bro im always interested in new theories and discussion and the other members above have produced these therories and im interested to know more isnt that what a discussion forum is all about? But you seem to just want to throw down every theory except your own. So stop saying useless responses and start saying why you believe in your theories so we can have an adult debate about them.

if we have to take more test every time to meet the same gains then ronnie coleman must be pinning 25 gs a week after 25 + years. I just broke it down for you as easy as i could.
 
if we have to take more test every time to meet the same gains then ronnie coleman must be pinning 25 gs a week after 25 + years. I just broke it down for you as easy as i could.

So the dosage ronnie started on in his very first cycle is still the same dosage he takes now? So thats your theory. Thats stupid or at least naive.
 
So the dosage ronnie started on in his very first cycle is still the same dosage he takes now? So thats your theory. Thats stupid or at least naive.

I agree no way can ronnie at 200 take the same amount at 300. but my guess to that would be once you build that much muscle you'd need more just to maintain what was previously acquired.
 
Receptors are continually replaced, each and every day....so "no", time doesn't come into play and therefore your theory is not correct.

makes sense. if receptors became saturated/useless/burnt out than people who stayed on year round wouldn't maintain/gain.
 
or flaming as i wrote a long post in another board the other day about flaming as flaming is rife there thats why ive come looking for a new board i am so against flaming so for me to flame would be wrong. Ill post the thread i wrote there here be back in a minute.
 
This is what i wrote.

Flaming. By *ANABOLIC SUPERMAN*
There are rules here on flaming and it seems some members either dont read them or understand them.(Yes im also talking to long time members here). So i'll update everyone on them.


Ive read about 5 threads in the last couple of days with new members starting the with with a 2 similiar phrases '' I know im going to get bashed here but...'' or ''I know from reading previous posts your going to call me a noob but...'', Why are these members so afraid to post? Because so many members here seem to jump on new members with insults and phrasing responses in an unpolite manner.
If you feel someone has posted a question without doing any research point them in the right direction with a link to the educational threads or a link that would help them instead of '' Get out of here noob do some bloody research''(Yes this is a flame and yes this is baiting an argument). Yes i understand members can get frustrated with new members uneducated unresearched posts but either dont respond in the thread or post something useful.
Think to yourself before your post '' Will my response be insulting to that member''.
I have been thinking.. If these 5 members are scared to post here imagine how many more there is? And do you know what? Those 5 posts were actually great posts with valid questions. Lets not deprive other potential new members of advice they need by scaring them off.

On to other flames - Condesending-Patronising-Baiting responses are all FLAMES or at least starting a flame.. So as i said earlier '' THINK BEFORE YOU POST''.

If you want to add anything to this let me know.
 
This is what i wrote.

Flaming. By *ANABOLIC SUPERMAN*
There are rules here on flaming and it seems some members either dont read them or understand them.(Yes im also talking to long time members here). So i'll update everyone on them.


Ive read about 5 threads in the last couple of days with new members starting the with with a 2 similiar phrases '' I know im going to get bashed here but...'' or ''I know from reading previous posts your going to call me a noob but...'', Why are these members so afraid to post? Because so many members here seem to jump on new members with insults and phrasing responses in an unpolite manner.
If you feel someone has posted a question without doing any research point them in the right direction with a link to the educational threads or a link that would help them instead of '' Get out of here noob do some bloody research''(Yes this is a flame and yes this is baiting an argument). Yes i understand members can get frustrated with new members uneducated unresearched posts but either dont respond in the thread or post something useful.
Think to yourself before your post '' Will my response be insulting to that member''.
I have been thinking.. If these 5 members are scared to post here imagine how many more there is? And do you know what? Those 5 posts were actually great posts with valid questions. Lets not deprive other potential new members of advice they need by scaring them off.

On to other flames - Condesending-Patronising-Baiting responses are all FLAMES or at least starting a flame.. So as i said earlier '' THINK BEFORE YOU POST''.

If you want to add anything to this let me know.

fukn right brolly thats why i have alot of patience when it comes to the young prospect poker's... they can ask me anything as many times as they need as long as they help themselves to the small library ..called steroid profiles we have.. and research before just assuming then ask away...now fuck off and quit asking me...lol JK...
 
I think cycling off is more about hpta rebound than degraded/loss of receptors. somebody on year round is most likely full aware of hpta consequences and probably accepts hrt as reality.

any studies on receptors?
 
ok my thread is offically... HIJACKED....well it was good while it lasted...no turnin back now...
 
yes, low dose test is a smart approach to a first cycle after one has gained a natural solid foundation through years of proper diet and training :)
 
yes, low dose test is a smart approach to a first cycle after one has gained a natural solid foundation through years of proper diet and training :)

well well....look what the cat dragged back...my fukn thread...lol its all good bro its a good disscusion
 
Back
Top