anavar dosage

agular9

New member
sorry for starting a new thread guys, but i need to get a quick answer and i know this is the best way to do it...

Im trying to cut and decided on anavar; i got the standard 10 mg pills. Im 5'9 195 lbs and about 13 percent bf.

no, its not the best way to cut, but just going to use anavar by itself.

question, going to start with 40 mg a day, should i be taking them throughout the day (e.g. morning, lunch, pre gym, post gym) or all at once like right before gym time?

I know low dosages do nothing so thats why I ask.
 
think the hl is somewhere around 8-9 hours so probably twice a day. should probably split it 20/20 but really 60-80mg would be much more beneficial, however...TEST TEST TEST. always. Anavar (var) is going to shut you down, you should run test with anything. im about to put some Anavar (var) into one of my cycles for the first time but IMO running an oral alone...you wont get a whole lot in the gains area.
 
Epoxy is steering u right bro. Maybe Deuce will catch it and lay it down as well. Split dosage is the way to go. 40mgs is alright, but 75-80mgs is what u looking for.
 
cool, yeah i started just doin it throughout the day, but it just didnt seem like it was the right way to go. Ill prob go 20 in the am 20 before workout which is around 5 or 6...

ill up the dosage if im not seeing enough fat loss. thanks guys
 
ill up the dosage if im not seeing enough fat loss. thanks guys

Fat loss is completely dependent on diet and cardio. Steroids do allow you to preserve muscle mass while cutting, but that's just about it... except if you're using Tren of course.
 
Anavar has been shown to help burn visceral fat but I agree, it is a minor factor when compared to diet and cardio.


Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995 Sep;19(9):614-24

Oral anabolic steroid treatment, but not parenteral androgen treatment, decreases abdominal fat in obese, older men.

Lovejoy JC, Bray GA, Greeson CS, Klemperer M, Morris J, Partington C, Tulley R.

Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808-4124, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of testosterone enanthate (TE), anabolic steroid (AS) or placebo (PL) on regional fat distribution and health risk factors in obese middle-aged men undergoing weight loss by dietary means.

DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, carried out for 9 months with primary assessments at 3 month intervals. Due to adverse blood lipid changes, the AS group was switched from oral oxandrolone (ASOX) to parenteral nandrolone decaoate (ASND) after the 3 month assessment point. SUBJECTS: Thirty healthy, obese men, aged 40-60 years, with serum testosterone (T) levels in the low-normal range (2-5 ng/mL).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Abdominal fat distribution and thigh muscle volume by CT scan, body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), insulin sensitivity by the Minimal Model method, blood lipids, blood chemistry, blood pressure, thyroid hormones and urological parameters.

RESULTS: After 3 months, there was a significantly greater decrease in subcutaneous (SQ) abdominal fat in the ASOX group compared to the TE and PL groups although body weight changes did not differ by treatment group. There was also a tendency for the ASOX group to exhibit greater losses in visceral fat, and the absolute level of visceral fat in this group was significantly lower at 3 months than in the TE and PL groups. There were significant main effects of treatment at 3 months on serum T and free T (increased in the TE group and decreased in the ASOX group) and on thyroid hormone parameters (T4 and T3 resin uptake significantly decreased in the ASOX group compared with the other two groups). There was a significant decrease in HDL-C, and increase in LDL-C in the ASOX group, which led to their being switched to the parenteral nandrolone decanoate (ASND) after 3 months. ASND had opposite effects on visceral fat from ASOX, producing a significant increase from 3 to 9 months while continuing to decrease SQ abdominal fat. ASND treatment also decreased thigh muscle area, while ASOX treatment increased high muscle. ASND reversed the effects of ASOX on lipoproteins and thyroid hormones. The previously reported effect of T to decrease visceral fat was not observed, in fact, visceral fat in the TE group increased slightly from 3 to 9 months, although SQ fat continued to decrease. Neither TE nor AS treatment resulted in any change in urologic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS: Oral oxandrolone decreased SQ abdominal fat more than TE or weight loss alone and also tended to produce favorable changes in visceral fat. TE and ASND injections given every 2 weeks had similar effects to weight loss alone on regional body fat. Most of the beneficial effects observed on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors were due to weight loss per se. These results suggest that SQ and visceral abdominal fat can be independently modulated by androgens and that at least some anabolic steroids are capable of influencing abdominal fat.
 
Back
Top