animal deletes his thread

dude said:
Why the hell is everyone always fighting about R-ALA?! It is always the same people. If your product is good then it will get the good reviews that it should from the majority of people who use it and I would think you wouldn't need to be so defensive about it. I've never used R-ALA and don't plan to but I will say that these types of posts where there are such strong views upholding the value of their product makes me not want to buy it even more.

When someone comes on a discussion board like this one, that we sponsor, and challenges the science and validity of our product, posts that we are scamming people, tells lies about the product and attacks the integrity of what we do, we defend ourselves. Now if that defense means you don't want to buy the product, that's your choice, but you can't possibly expect us lay down and let someone post such things without a vigorous response.
We were the first company in the US to supply R+ALA to the public. It was reserved for doctors and researchers before we did.
By the end of this year our sales will top 30,000 bottles a month. And since you mention that a product should live on it's reviews and results you may be interested to know that all this has occurred with $0 being spent in the last two years on advertising it other than a few internet boards. It's selling the way it is because it works, not because we say it does.
 
No you weren't and no it wasn't?

'We were the first company in the US to supply R+ALA to the public. It was reserved for doctors and researchers before we did. '

I hear leptoprin is doing great, too, as is the 2 day diet in a bottle. Oh yea, the latter got sued out of business cause it was bullshit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"I hear leptoprin is doing great, too, as is the 2 day diet in a bottle. Oh yea, the latter got sued out of business cause it was bullshit."

I don't know anything about that. Was it sold for over 20 years in Europe as a prescription med like R+ALA was for insulin sensitivity? After being sold in Europe for 20+ years I think it's pretty safe to say they would have discovered any flaws with it by now.


"No you weren't and no it wasn't?"

You're full of it again Animal and I don't have time to argue your lies.
If you think we were not first to market with this product fine. Post a list of companies who came before us.
 
ulter said:
When someone comes on a discussion board like this one, that we sponsor, and challenges the science and validity of our product, posts that we are scamming people, tells lies about the product and attacks the integrity of what we do, we defend ourselves. Now if that defense means you don't want to buy the product, that's your choice, but you can't possibly expect us lay down and let someone post such things without a vigorous response.
We were the first company in the US to supply R+ALA to the public. It was reserved for doctors and researchers before we did.
By the end of this year our sales will top 30,000 bottles a month. And since you mention that a product should live on it's reviews and results you may be interested to know that all this has occurred with $0 being spent in the last two years on advertising it other than a few internet boards. It's selling the way it is because it works, not because we say it does.
I can understand that. I just felt that these posts very rarely turn into anything beneficial. It seems as though a lot of people are responding well to the product and judging by your sales stats it is. In that case I wouldn't let a few people bring you down because you offer a great product. Take care.
 
Back
Top