Austin1
New member
Thanks for being a mature adult about this dude.
Get lost.
Thanks for being a mature adult about this dude.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3166186
"p-synephrine is structurally related to ephedrine [3, 6, 8] (Figure 2). However, ephedrine is a phenylpropanolamine (Figure 4) derivative and does not contain a para-substituted hydroxy group. The addition of the parahydroxygroup on the p-synephrine molecule, as well as the lack of the methyl group on the side chain change the stereochemistry and as a consequence the receptor binding characteristics and the pharmacokinetic properties, including the ability of p-synephrine to cross the blood-brain barrier. The lipid solubility of p-synephrine as compared to ephedrine is significantly decreased, resulting in little transport of p-synephrine into the CNS as compared to ephedrine [27]."
I've been reading this forum daily for almost a year now and never really felt the need to post. It's just sad that the one time I come here to DISCUSS something (what a forum is based on).. I can't even get a useful response when I have legitimate questions. I understand you did your research, but I don't think it's out of line for me to ask what you've found. I'm not an expert, if I was I wouldn't be asking you questions.
Who's Austinite? Lol...
You're conducting the experiment and getting it published?
2 are complete and will be published, not one.
Impressive.
Thanks.
That wasn't sarcasm by the way. I'm published on 2 papers myself (in addiction pharmacology, not nutrition). I know how stressful it is.. Good luck! You're lack of desire to go into depth with my questions makes more sense now.
I'm almost freaked out to ask this but is Creatine modifying the stack?