Dialing in your hormones....

CHIP WADOWSKI

New member
I dont care who you are om this board or any other, know one thing: getting your hormones dialed in properly is NO EXACT SCIENCE. I dont care how many studies may show that if you inject "X" amount of test that your levels should end up a "Y". Everybody metabolises their meds at different rates. I don CARE if someone spouts off and say 1mg 3x week of anastrozole is too much. BULLSHIT. Live it, then tell me you are the expert. Programs are individulized on a case by case basis. So dont get so caught up in a lot of the shit you read guys cause much or most of it may not even apply to you. Oh yeah..... Good Morning.:bigok:
 
good morning Chip!

good post. We need reminders like that once in a while.

thanks for the continued education. =)
 
EXACTLY. Docs play what I call the "theoretical" game. They think scientific theory is 100 percent with every case across the board. Before I switched to chip I told my last doc "look, I don't care what SHOULD happen when I take this, I'm telling you what DOES happen."

edit: bio-individuality is the word I was looking for. Every individuals body is biologically different and the hormones are balanced different in every one.

For instance the individuality of my body might be that homeostasis for MY body is to keep a 10 to 3 test to estrogen ratio. (this is a crude example) but now jack up that test to 100, and my body is going to jack the estrogen up to 30 to maintain homeostasis of the 10 to 3 ratio

homeostasis for YOUR body on the other hand might be to keep a 10 to 1 test to estrogen ratio. This means if you jack YOUR test up to 100, your estrogen is only going to rise to 10 to keep homeostasis....no big deal.

Point is, everyone is different.
 
Last edited:
I dont care who you are om this board or any other, know one thing: getting your hormones dialed in properly is NO EXACT SCIENCE. I dont care how many studies may show that if you inject "X" amount of test that your levels should end up a "Y". Everybody metabolises their meds at different rates. I don CARE if someone spouts off and say 1mg 3x week of anastrozole is too much. BULLSHIT. Live it, then tell me you are the expert. Programs are individulized on a case by case basis. So dont get so caught up in a lot of the shit you read guys cause much or most of it may not even apply to you. Oh yeah..... Good Morning.:bigok:

Agree, 100%, the one thing I have learned with all the research I have done is that everyone is different and the only way to really find out what works or doesn't is to try it. My biggest pet peeve is when guys on the boards criticize other guys' protocols based on their own. For example, I take 200 mg./wk. cyp. and that puts my test level at 650. Whenever other guys hear that I take 200, they say that is a "steroid dose." Ignorant.
 
Some people have different enzymes level and or liver functionality and are more active than others.
 
I agree its totally trial and error. Its also wise to get this figured out right away so you always have something to fall back on when you decide to experiment.

if someone is taking 3mg of adex a week there is a problem. it would be silly not to switch to letro even if its just for the cost factor.

the human body is suppose to aromatase roughly .3% if its way out of control its telling you something.

If i had to take that much i would have to question my dose of T, i would most likely reduce since im wasting it converting to E. and figure out if its my thyroid or what the hell is making it do that. While I have no problem taking a marginal dose of testosterone, even though it can effect my cholesterol. im not willing to take the risk of what 3mg of adex will do to my lipids.



"In several small studies, anastrozole showed no marked effects on lipid profile (Dewar et al, 2000; Kataja et al, 2002; Sawada and Sato, 2003; Wojtacki et al, 2004). Kataja et al, (2002) showed LDL levels fell with both exemestane and anastrozole and triglycerides fell with exemestane, but remained stable with anastrozole. However, anastrozole was associated with a higher incidence of hypercholesterolaemia than tamoxifen in the ATAC study (ATAC Trialists Group, 2002). In the Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex (ITA) trial, patients switching to anastrozole after 2 or more years of tamoxifen were also found to have higher levels of hypercholesterolaemia than those continuing on tamoxifen, 8.1 and 2.7%, respectively (Boccardo et al, 2003). In addition, a recent study of the effect of anastrozole on serum lipid profiles in 38 postmenopausal patients with breast cancer found significant increases in total cholesterol, LDL and HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, B and lp(a) (Hozumi et al, 2004). Anastrozole was associated with a slightly higher incidence of ischaemic cardiovascular disease than tamoxifen in the ATAC study, but this was not significant (ATAC Trialists Group, 2002)."

http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v93/n1s/full/6602692a.html
 
Last edited:
so chip... I have this rash.... Hahahahaha
wanna dial me in?

tony, i do have a solution for your rash. We can smear coconut oil all over your little sack and le my two pit bulls lick it off as my cock-er-spaniel (with a mowhawk) fucks you in the ass. Youll be fine and discharged from the pysch ward in no time!
 
Back
Top