Gear, HGH and Age - 29 years old

[dg_bjeo]

Hi all this is my first post, here are my numbers:
6'1, 218lbs, 9%bf, 29 years old

I want to put on about 15 pounds of muscle which I can maintain for 2-3 years following a cycle. I'm a wrestler so its really easy to lose muscle given all of the endurance exercises that I train with in addition to powerlifting.

This will be my second cycle, it has been 3 years since I did my first test+deca stack.

I'm debating on doing a cycle of Test/Tren vs going balls out on an HGH cycle. I'm well aware that HGH is the better way to go but its hella expensive!

I've heard that HGH levels decrease in your late 20s and that HGH promotes the development of NEW muscle cells (along with organs, bone etc. but I'd be willing to take the risk to reach this goal). This to me sounds like more permanent gains - does anyone have experience with this? The stuff would stretch my finances extremely so I'd like to avoid it, but again will do it if it means reaching my goal.

Given my age, do you think that I can get the results I want (15lbs lean muscle that lasts 2-3 years) in a cycle without HGH?

Thanks all in advance for your responses, Excuse any mistakes I'm really not an expert on this stuff.

Doug

 

[MassMonster86]

balls out on HGH will cause nothing but problems..

do test only and take it from there ..




Just my 2 cents.

 

[Shaptown]

Just what exactly do you mean when you say "go balls out on HGH"?

Oh and also, 15 pounds of solid muscle is a fuckload my friend. You are already fairly large with good body fat. Your goals are probably only attainable with massive quantities of food, very heaving lifting, AAS, and other peptides.

 

[Ythrashin]

Test and EQ would be better I think. Maybe even Test, EQ and Var...

 

[Ythrashin]

If anything stacking the HGH with the AAS would be good...

Is that what you meant by "balls out"?

 

[dg_bjeo]

Thanks for all of your replies.

To clarify what I meant by 'Balls out', I have been contemplating a stack of AAS with HGH. I don't know the specifics of the stack yet as I'm in the very early stages of learning. From what I understand, this would promote the growth of NEW muscle cells and development of existing muscles. Whereas AAS alone would only grow existing muscle muscles at my age (and would be less sustainable gains?). Am I on the right track with this or am I way of??

Again my goal is 10-15 pounds of sustainable muscle over 2-3 years. I'd rather steer away from HGH due to the pricetag and do AAS alone if it can get me the results I need.

 

[GrowthMan]

Hi all this is my first post, here are my numbers:
6'1, 218lbs, 9%bf, 29 years old

I want to put on about 15 pounds of muscle which I can maintain for 2-3 years following a cycle. I'm a wrestler so its really easy to lose muscle given all of the endurance exercises that I train with in addition to powerlifting.

This will be my second cycle, it has been 3 years since I did my first test+deca stack.

I'm debating on doing a cycle of Test/Tren vs going balls out on an HGH cycle. I'm well aware that HGH is the better way to go but its hella expensive!

I've heard that HGH levels decrease in your late 20s and that HGH promotes the development of NEW muscle cells (along with organs, bone etc. but I'd be willing to take the risk to reach this goal). This to me sounds like more permanent gains - does anyone have experience with this? The stuff would stretch my finances extremely so I'd like to avoid it, but again will do it if it means reaching my goal.

Given my age, do you think that I can get the results I want (15lbs lean muscle that lasts 2-3 years) in a cycle without HGH?

Thanks all in advance for your responses, Excuse any mistakes I'm really not an expert on this stuff.

Doug

They need to be done together, Doug. Test and HGH are synergistic with one another. They both flourish when the other is present. Tren will only make it better.