Y
YellowJacket
Guest
You make very good points Big K! Im eager to see if Mike uses this as an advertising ploy for his ala or not.... then we will see 
Glucoral-R Lab Report
- Thread starter Eze
- Start date
This matter will be settled in Federal court. Someone is behind this hoax and they will be flushed out.
Glucorell R is tested and has been tested by independent labs twice a year and with every new batch. The test results are posted on the Glucorell R website. They tell a much different story than our competitors test of our product.
Another independent lab test is being done right now by San Rafael Chemical who most people on the boards know is a very good lab. The results should be in tomorrow.
We don't believe that the labs we use are giving us anything but the most accurate results, and they will gladly verify the results with anyone who contacts them.
The lab that is supposed to have tested Glucorell R for our competitor won't even admit they did the test. Let alone answer any questions about it.
Glucorell R is tested and has been tested by independent labs twice a year and with every new batch. The test results are posted on the Glucorell R website. They tell a much different story than our competitors test of our product.
Another independent lab test is being done right now by San Rafael Chemical who most people on the boards know is a very good lab. The results should be in tomorrow.
We don't believe that the labs we use are giving us anything but the most accurate results, and they will gladly verify the results with anyone who contacts them.
The lab that is supposed to have tested Glucorell R for our competitor won't even admit they did the test. Let alone answer any questions about it.
I can tell one reason if I were to hazzard a guess. His lawyers told him that putting up our trademarked logo without permission entitles us to a statutory damage (which means without asking for damages) of $5000 for every view that page got while it was up. I think the meter is up to about $500,000 already.
Kronk makes a good point. I read the whole thread at bodybuilding.com and this was my response:
To me the biggest issue is the integrity of the testing process itself. The bottom line is that there are serious questions about whether or not the sample submitted was the same as what anafit is shipping to its customers.
I apologize that I don't know a lot of the posters here since I haven't been here before, I saw a link to this thread on steroidology, where I am a moderator. I want to be up front that anafit is a sponsor at steroidology, but I really don't care, I don't own the site and don't pay any of the bills.
I don't know Mike but have heard good things about his products. I frequent ulter's board and believe him to be credible. I order his products frequently and I have been very pleased with all of them. I consider him an innovator and an astute businessman.
I won't say any more about whether these allegations are true but the process as it has been described in this thread is suspect. From what has transpired, if I were in ulter's shoes I would be filing suit as well. He really has no other meaningful alternative as I see it. And as an attorney, I would always prefer other means of resolving a dispute - litigation is the most burdensome way to do it but in some circumstances (like when the lab is stonewalling you) you have no other choice.
As far as the question of the legitimacy of the products itself, Bruce Kneller and ulter each suggested that some independent party needs to buy samples and submit them for testing to an independent lab (perhaps a party and lab agreed upon and paid by both sides of this dispute). There really is no other way to get lab results that don't have at least the appearance of impropriety all over them.
To me the biggest issue is the integrity of the testing process itself. The bottom line is that there are serious questions about whether or not the sample submitted was the same as what anafit is shipping to its customers.
I apologize that I don't know a lot of the posters here since I haven't been here before, I saw a link to this thread on steroidology, where I am a moderator. I want to be up front that anafit is a sponsor at steroidology, but I really don't care, I don't own the site and don't pay any of the bills.
I don't know Mike but have heard good things about his products. I frequent ulter's board and believe him to be credible. I order his products frequently and I have been very pleased with all of them. I consider him an innovator and an astute businessman.
I won't say any more about whether these allegations are true but the process as it has been described in this thread is suspect. From what has transpired, if I were in ulter's shoes I would be filing suit as well. He really has no other meaningful alternative as I see it. And as an attorney, I would always prefer other means of resolving a dispute - litigation is the most burdensome way to do it but in some circumstances (like when the lab is stonewalling you) you have no other choice.
As far as the question of the legitimacy of the products itself, Bruce Kneller and ulter each suggested that some independent party needs to buy samples and submit them for testing to an independent lab (perhaps a party and lab agreed upon and paid by both sides of this dispute). There really is no other way to get lab results that don't have at least the appearance of impropriety all over them.
Similar threads
