How do I use 2 DIFFERENT brands of Test Cyp?

kilsong

New member
I'm planning my cycle of Tren Ace and Test Cyp.
I currently get Watson Test Cyp for testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) from Walgreen's Pharmacy.{200mg/ml}
However, it's not enough so I'm going to order from a UGL. {250mg/ml}
Obviously it wont be the same quality as the one I get from the pharmacy.
The Tren will be between 200mg-250mg per week {intentional low dose}.
The Test will be 400-500mg per week
How do I incorporate the UGL Test with the pharmacy Test?
Should I use up the pharmacy Test first--or do 1 UGL and 1 pharmacy Test?
I plan on injecting the Test twice weekly.
Suggestions?
Also---feel free to critique this whole cycle...pros/cons.

Thanks!!
 
Any good UGL should be accurately dosed, so I don't see why it would make any difference. If it were me, I would probably continue to use the pharm as prescribed, and supplement with the UGL to get to the dose you want. As for the cycle, I haven't used tren yet, so I won't comment on that, but depending on your cycle history, I might go up to 500-600 with the test. You didn't say how long you were planning to run this.
 
200mg/ml is exactly what it says..... 200mg of test per milliliter of solution. it should be the same the only difference i see would be in quality of oil/sterility
 
Im curious to see how your cycle works for you. Test is what I think I'll try for my first cycle

test is needed in every cycle, so i think your on point with that decision lol..

and @op If i personally were on testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) i'd definitley keep that baseline 200mg of pharm grade so regardless if the UGL stuff you get is g2g or not you still have decent test levels because if its bunk gear and ur on tren you may face tons of different problems without any test
 
I would stick with your testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) dose of test and run the Tren Ace @50,75 or 100mgs/EOD. Tren has a 5x higher androgenic/anabolic rating than test. Tren and Test both fight for the same androgen receptors and the tren always wins because it's stronger, leaving the excess test to float around and convert to estrogen. This will make it harder for you to manage your estrogen levels and if you don't manage that properly the tren will raise your prolactin levels. A testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) dose of test is perfect because it will be enough to maintain your normal bodily functions and it will allow the Tren to do its magic with less sides...
 
Mustang...
I understand what your saying. Kinda hard not to-seeing as it makes perfect sense.
However--I read the test should be 300 minimum.
I'd like to not have this query at all and just go with the 200 I get from TRT.
Assuming I run the Tren at 200 a week, would 300 Test weekly be pushing it?
200/200 sounds too convenient.
 
Mustang...
I understand what your saying. Kinda hard not to-seeing as it makes perfect sense.
However--I read the test should be 300 minimum.
I'd like to not have this query at all and just go with the 200 I get from TRT.
Assuming I run the Tren at 200 a week, would 300 Test weekly be pushing it?
200/200 sounds too convenient.

I've ran both high test/low tren (1G+ test / 500mg+ tren) and 700mg tren + 500 test and both have worked good for me.. i know neithe rof those is really low test or low tren but its worked lol
 
Mustang...
I understand what your saying. Kinda hard not to-seeing as it makes perfect sense.
However--I read the test should be 300 minimum.
I'd like to not have this query at all and just go with the 200 I get from TRT.
Assuming I run the Tren at 200 a week, would 300 Test weekly be pushing it?
200/200 sounds too convenient.

Any test dosage around or over your tren dosage would be a waste IMO. I'd keep your testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) dosage(200mgs/week) and run the tren a @75mgs/EOD(262.5mgs/week) or @100mgs/EOD(350mgs/week).
 
Any good UGL should be accurately dosed, so I don't see why it would make any difference. If it were me, I would probably continue to use the pharm as prescribed, and supplement with the UGL to get to the dose you want. As for the cycle, I haven't used tren yet, so I won't comment on that, but depending on your cycle history, I might go up to 500-600 with the test. You didn't say how long you were planning to run this.

200mg/ml is exactly what it says..... 200mg of test per milliliter of solution. it should be the same the only difference i see would be in quality of oil/sterility

Some of the home brewers and UGL's will use generic powder weights for the recipe conversion. Typically this value is set in the calculators at .75-.85 regardless of the compound. If you're making a small 50ml batch or so accuracy isn't off by much but if making large batches, as in the case of UGL (note not all UGL's do this, some are really good at what they do) the gear will tend to be underdosed slightly and the larger the batch the more the discrepancy.
 
I would stick with your testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) dose of test and run the Tren Ace @50,75 or 100mgs/EOD. Tren has a 5x higher androgenic/anabolic rating than test. Tren and Test both fight for the same androgen receptors and the tren always wins because it's stronger, leaving the excess test to float around and convert to estrogen. This will make it harder for you to manage your estrogen levels and if you don't manage that properly the tren will raise your prolactin levels. A testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) dose of test is perfect because it will be enough to maintain your normal bodily functions and it will allow the Tren to do its magic with less sides...


While this is technically true, there are other indirect effects that testosterone will have on the cycle so it's not always the best choice to have low test on a tren cycle just bc of receptor affinity. This isn't to say that it's wrong to do low test, I'm just trying to point out that even with test and tren fighting for both receptors there will still be benefits to the testosterone.

William Llewellyn said:
***8220;While there may possibly be differences in the way various compounds could foster growth indirectly, such that advantages might even be found with certain synergistic drug combinations, the primary mode of action with all of these compounds is the androgen receptor. The notion that steroid X and Y must never be stacked together because they both compete for the same receptor when stimulating growth, while X and Z should be combined because they work via different mechanisms, should likewise not be taken too seriously. Such classifications are based on speculation only, and upon reasonable investigation are clearly invalid.***8221;

Excerpt From: Llewellyn, William. ***8220;Anabolics.***8221;
 
Back
Top