Oral trenbolone. Does it work?

I'll give in and give MENT the distinction of most toxic hormone IN PRODUCTION...
Due to the fact that toxicity of 'regular' 17aa androgens is greatly exagerated, I do believe MENT is not quite the monster in real life it appears to be on paper. However, Extreme caution should still be used if anyone dares experiment. Liver hepatoxicity and prolactin/progestin induced gyno appear to be two very real threats faced when using this compound.
I'd bet a majority of its users are fighters that are looking for a super boost before a fight. Not sure if it compares directly, but when you look at how much more androgenic methyltest is compared to test, doing the same to tren would make one mighty potent hormone. Plus in this type of use, only a dose or two are required so liver toxicity would not be an issue.
I too would like to see if the results are as increased as the side effects. I sincerly hope so, since someone has to be using it ( a source doesn't stock anything that doesn't sell!)
 
Stone said:
I'll give in and give MENT the distinction of most toxic hormone IN PRODUCTION...
Due to the fact that toxicity of 'regular' 17aa androgens is greatly exagerated, I do believe MENT is not quite the monster in real life it appears to be on paper. However, Extreme caution should still be used if anyone dares experiment. Liver hepatoxicity and prolactin/progestin induced gyno appear to be two very real threats faced when using this compound.
I'd bet a majority of its users are fighters that are looking for a super boost before a fight. Not sure if it compares directly, but when you look at how much more androgenic methyltest is compared to test, doing the same to tren would make one mighty potent hormone. Plus in this type of use, only a dose or two are required so liver toxicity would not be an issue.
I too would like to see if the results are as increased as the side effects. I sincerly hope so, since someone has to be using it ( a source doesn't stock anything that doesn't sell!)


I would tend to agree... MENT apparently is very harsh - while not on the liver, it is harsh in just about every other aspect.


I would give methyl tren a go... if it were given to me and i could be given blood tests on the house :toilet:
 
megadose said:
yep thanks proving my point even more b) anyone who disagrees is a moron and pretty much asking for a death wish. go ahead and prove all wrong try it who knows u might only lose half ur liver thats not so bad.


You have no point.You're just parroting what anecdotal hearsay supposedly prove.
Now,if you give me some hard facts,like alt/ast results before/after a cycle of methyltrienolone in comparison to a halo or anadrol cycle you *might* have a point.
Such myths about toxicity have been proven wrong many times.
Example: anadrol is one of the most toxic orals...well,if you take 150mg/ed of any oral you'll have a liver problem.Anavar could be much worse@150mg/ed.In fact anadrol's supposed "lethargy" isn't due to anadrol but the beginning of toxic buildup.Any hepatitis patients feels like that.But nobody thinks that it could be that 100mg/ed is considered baseline.
Example 2:winstrol is one of the mildest orals...it could be the very worst for hdl/ldl and liver.
I could go on and on without an end.But unless you or any other person you quote as great scientists give me some facts then i'll just think it's an oral not unlike most others and that it would need to be used in low dosages ,for no more than 4 weeks with liver supplements to along with it.
 
I think the liver toxicity of methyltrenbolone is probably exaggerated much like it was for trenbolone. A lot of bodybuilding resources indicate that tren is extremely dangerous to the liver and kidneys, but no scientific literature exists to back up these claims. there are anecdotal reports around claiming trenbolone causes liver damage, but when you consider that almost anyone using tren stacks it with other Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) at the same time it makes it difficult to point the blame at tren.

Methyltrienolone should be somewhat liver toxic just like most orals, but I can't see it being worse than a halogenated Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) like halotestin.
 
Gtrack said:
You have no point.You're just parroting what anecdotal hearsay supposedly prove.
Now,if you give me some hard facts,like alt/ast results before/after a cycle of methyltrienolone in comparison to a halo or anadrol cycle you *might* have a point.
Such myths about toxicity have been proven wrong many times.
Example: anadrol is one of the most toxic orals...well,if you take 150mg/ed of any oral you'll have a liver problem.Anavar could be much worse@150mg/ed.In fact anadrol's supposed "lethargy" isn't due to anadrol but the beginning of toxic buildup.Any hepatitis patients feels like that.But nobody thinks that it could be that 100mg/ed is considered baseline.
Example 2:winstrol is one of the mildest orals...it could be the very worst for hdl/ldl and liver.
I could go on and on without an end.But unless you or any other person you quote as great scientists give me some facts then i'll just think it's an oral not unlike most others and that it would need to be used in low dosages ,for no more than 4 weeks with liver supplements to along with it.
prove me wrong try it who knows maybe i am wrong but why take any unnessary risks. IMHO stick to the Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) that have known side effects( due to decades of use and research) because at least u know what to espect unlike methyl tren which no one is exactly sure of.
 
goiterjoe said:
I think the liver toxicity of methyltrenbolone is probably exaggerated much like it was for trenbolone. A lot of bodybuilding resources indicate that tren is extremely dangerous to the liver and kidneys, but no scientific literature exists to back up these claims. there are anecdotal reports around claiming trenbolone causes liver damage, but when you consider that almost anyone using tren stacks it with other Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) at the same time it makes it difficult to point the blame at tren.

Methyltrienolone should be somewhat liver toxic just like most orals, but I can't see it being worse than a halogenated Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) like halotestin.
Be carefull of creating a "slippery slope" logical fallacy. ie dbol is supposed to be bad for your liver but it isn't really _that_ bad so if Methyltrienolone is supposed to be bad for your liver then it isn't _that_ bad, either.

Or, other 17-alpha-alkylated molecules aren't _that_ bad, so this one isn't, either.

Methyltrienolone is its own distinct molecule. I put a lot of credibility in what Bill Roberts claims, but nobody is completely correct.

What we need to really know is real world experience, with a hepatic panel to go along with it.
 
megadose said:
prove me wrong try it who knows maybe i am wrong but why take any unnessary risks. IMHO stick to the Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) that have known side effects( due to decades of use and research) because at least u know what to espect unlike methyl tren which no one is exactly sure of.



Now,THAT is a great point.
Because there has to be a reason to do something new.It has to have some advantages in relation to the tried .Personally i have not come across a wall so high no substance most of us know cannot help me with.But then again i said the same thing before tren and after tren it seemed like i took 5 steroids at once.
The problem with this substance is we know nothing for sure.No hard facts,not many users.Sometimes facts are more trustworthy,sometimes experience is better.But we know nothing of its good point,rather we know mostly about its dangers.
But then again,most of the "prohormones" that still are produced are hardly known.

For now ,i'll stick to tren and the rest.But if i tried methyltrien i'd do it cautiously ,treating it with respect.Not afraid but not carelessly either.Until more good,reliable sources have it it could also be tren too...
 
I found this its a profile on mibolerone(cheque drops)

"Unfortunately because of its 17-alpha-alkylation it also rivaled methyltrienolone (metribolone) in liver toxicity, making it completely unsafe to even use 5 mg a day without killing yourself short term. A much better choice in that regard would have been trestolone (MENT), which is the same as Mibolerone but doesn't possess the toxic 17-alpha-methyl group. Sadly enough, MENT was never commercially marketed despite its well documented use as a male contraceptive (same for Mibolerone as well by the way"
 
I'll be the guinea pig, im considering trying 3-5 mg/day.... Still trying to find more info on it. I found some info suggesting 5-15mg/day for dosing.
 
NYCEE said:
I'll be the guinea pig, im considering trying 3-5 mg/day.... Still trying to find more info on it. I found some info suggesting 5-15mg/day for dosing.
OC Cartel said:
i'm gonna give it a test drive at several mg's/day taken in am/pm doses, will report shortly
Just to be clear, which do each of you intend to use:

1) Mibolerone (Cheque Drops) - Not good for the liver
2) Trestolone (MENT) - Apparently w/o the liver toxicity problems of Mibolerone
3) Metribolone - Makes Cheque Drops look like Flintstone Vitamins
 
mranak said:
Just to be clear, which do each of you intend to use:

1) Mibolerone (Cheque Drops) - Not good for the liver
2) Trestolone (MENT) - Apparently w/o the liver toxicity problems of Mibolerone
3) Metribolone - Makes Cheque Drops look like Flintstone Vitamins

mr. anak!!!1 :wavey:

we plan to use cheque drops (mibolerone) along with Methyl-trenbolone (methyltrienolone)......(not in conjunction or for extended periods of course)

all that is unclear is dose and lenght of use......
for mod status, maybe you could help do some research with us???

i've checked a dozen sites regarding mainly the methyl tren, all i get are case studies and how my liver will explode out of my chest like in alien.

thanks mr. anak :)
 
Back
Top