just a dose per week instead of splitting twice? but by doing a single dose I would have more high level and therefore more e2 conversion right?
Last edited:
Question about subcutaneous injections...is better or not?
- Thread starter KM2016
- Start date
jp4355
New member
I used it when I 1st started Cycling in 78' for it's many Benefits.
But AI's and SERMS weren't in use yet, so there were No Other Options.
I did well on it, but today, while I still do use it with every Cycle ~ I also use an AI in conjunction with it............................... JP
P.S.
Back in the Day, you didn't have everyone using AAS, thinking it was Muscles in a Vial.
I don't remember anyone using AAS that wasn't a Serious Lifter.
I was Competing in the AAU as a Powerlifter back then, I had a Coach, and a Doctor who was Prescribing for me.
Mycelium
New member
Why illogical? I dose every 3 days and can definitily find arguments against it, but the word illogical wouldn't come up. Its pretty demanding, inconvient, uses twice as many syringes and it even wastes non-renewable resources.
Basically yes while the levels are higher and no when the levels are low. Weekly injections are not abnormal. The ester attached has to be longer. We couldn't use an ester with a 3 day 1/2 life.
Mycelium
New member
Weekly injections lead to weekly ups and downs. Estrogen production would be tied to that. The 3 days/3.5 day timing is an attempt to keep constant blood levels of testosterone and keep it's conversions level. Our natural cycle is a daily high in the morning and a low at night time. A sort of biological daily adjustment based off the negative feedback loop.
Ziegler
light weightlifter
because the technology of these esters are there to be utilized
one injection per week = 52 injections per year
once every 3 days is going to = more than 110 injections per year
so in 10 years at once a week is going to= 520 injections
in 10 years at every 3 days is going to = well over a thousand injections
all that extra poking (that isn't good for you at all) can be avoided by getting it dialed in at once a week
at any rate that solution is not the answer because if it was then all the doctors and clinics would be issuing a once every 3rd day regimen right ?
now lets here all the geniuses start hollering "doctors & trt clinics dont know shit" lol
Have not feel a real difference between intra muscular or subcutane injection.
The T levels and also the E2 production seems to be the same.
If you are using the correct stuff, subcutane injection is really healthier then musculat, because, what you feel under the skin is the same thing what it does in your muscles. Only you can't feel it in the muscles.
The most products are too thick for good result of subbcutane injection. You need a thinner oily base and the only one product what I have found here is "Testosteron Depo" from Galenica. It's good available in eastern europe. But what is good anywhere else around the world... don't know!?
It sounds funny, but I only inject it into the ballsack, because there is very soft skin and there it has never build any bubbles or so.
The result is the same as every other skin region. If you have a round belly, there also is a really good place!
The T levels and also the E2 production seems to be the same.
If you are using the correct stuff, subcutane injection is really healthier then musculat, because, what you feel under the skin is the same thing what it does in your muscles. Only you can't feel it in the muscles.
The most products are too thick for good result of subbcutane injection. You need a thinner oily base and the only one product what I have found here is "Testosteron Depo" from Galenica. It's good available in eastern europe. But what is good anywhere else around the world... don't know!?
It sounds funny, but I only inject it into the ballsack, because there is very soft skin and there it has never build any bubbles or so.
The result is the same as every other skin region. If you have a round belly, there also is a really good place!
Softer skin regions and a good thinner product is nessecary. With too thik stuff and/or not flexilbe skin you get bumps what need longer to absorb from body.
The softest region on me is the ballsack... absolute easy, but not for everyones nerves...
You have to try out and if you like it, so use it so!
If you get problems, do it intra muscular ir try gels, what I found the best option for TRT (not for ultrahigh bodybuilding levels!).
The softest region on me is the ballsack... absolute easy, but not for everyones nerves...
You have to try out and if you like it, so use it so!
If you get problems, do it intra muscular ir try gels, what I found the best option for TRT (not for ultrahigh bodybuilding levels!).
IMT
IMT Rep
Have not feel a real difference between intra muscular or subcutane injection.
The T levels and also the E2 production seems to be the same.
If you are using the correct stuff, subcutane injection is really healthier then musculat, because, what you feel under the skin is the same thing what it does in your muscles. Only you can't feel it in the muscles.
The most products are too thick for good result of subbcutane injection. You need a thinner oily base and the only one product what I have found here is "Testosteron Depo" from Galenica. It's good available in eastern europe. But what is good anywhere else around the world... don't know!?
It sounds funny, but I only inject it into the ballsack, because there is very soft skin and there it has never build any bubbles or so.
The result is the same as every other skin region. If you have a round belly, there also is a really good place!
hmmm if its a choice of pinning in my ballsack or my belly I op for the latter. Gives me the hibby jibbies just thinking about pinning on my homies.
