SARMS in liquid vs capsule form?

synonymous

New member
As a research chem I understand the reason for it being a liquid form. It also allows users to dial in their dose as needed. However, I see on other boards people talking crap about the pills that are out there and how it can't possibly be a true SARM if in a pill. However, I don't know how that is true. Isn't the raw ingredient powder to begin with? Is there something special about the liquid that makes things more bio-available?
 
It's due to the fact that SARMS aren't supposed to be sold for human consumption. That's how research companies get away with selling them. If it's in capsules and marketed for human consumption....it's likely either illegal, or another substance labeled as SARMS.
 
whats special is the RC liquid SARMS are being sold properly (IMO) and not as a supplement (which they are not). liquid is sold as a research chemical, meant to those that know what they are doing. not being sold in pills as a figgin supplement and marketing it to teens or what not.

so the question should be more of: do you want to buy from a shady place selling these as a supp to noobs or do you want to buy it from a respectable place selling it as something to be used carefully and meant to be going to those that should know what they are doing?

I have recently called out a few people (reps) on the forums about pushing SARMS and MK677 as "safer and better than test and no PCT needed" type of BS. or even to replace hrt (which might be possible in future, but people saying that now are using it as marketing ploy for what we have at this stage of sarms)

I would rather buy it in liquid form and from a trusted shop thats been around for years.

BTW our sponsor here RUI has been around over 10 years, iv used them for about 7 myself.
I mean buy from who you want, just adding that in since i do rec them alot.
 
It's due to the fact that SARMS aren't supposed to be sold for human consumption. That's how research companies get away with selling them. If it's in capsules and marketed for human consumption....it's likely either illegal, or another substance labeled as SARMS.

ohh trust me man there are some sick people out there selling them as SUPPS!?! as if it was something from GNC, makes me sick, its too reckless!
FDA just got involved with a couple places and im happy they did (surprised to say that tbh)

and i agree if its RC and the place is selling it as so, to me that means they are going about it in smart way. so why buy from a possibly stupid shady place when it should be sold as an RC, not just from a moral standpoint, but a legal one also (possibly)
 
I think it can be sold in capsule form and there is actual powder form of the active ingredient. I have had positive results from capsule, sublingual and liquid forms.

I just think that the liquid and sublingual forms are more bio-available and more of the active ingredient actually reaches your bloodstream.
 
The place where I got GW (Something RUI doesn't carry.) was from a company that is still around and reputable enough. They had these products pulled and are focused on others now.

I only ask about the liquid vs pill form because I happen to mention I had pill form GW and got slammed by the masses that it was not GW and that nothing in a capsule could be. It simply wouldn't work.

Theyre pushing their line of SARMS so there's that. But I figured I'd ask here
 
pushing it why? because they purchased bulk quantities of raw powder and now need to sell it off? there probably are (and I say probably because I haven't done the tests) a few legit companies that sell a decent pill. But I wrote on a separate thread the issues that seem to plaque the pill market is the unknown spiking.

I also think Juiced it the nail on the head that the sup companies (which I have also written on this forum) are pushing anything for a buck. this is the main issue with sup companies these days. hence the reason for the lawsuit against B Labs. another sup company was the one who pushed for legal action.

its really a good topic and I wish more companies would respond and show proof of the product? don't leave the consumer wondering if the last shipment from china was powdered down and added with filler? what real testing does a sup company do when they are selling a product that isn't for human consumption?
 
its really a good topic and I wish more companies would respond and show proof of the product? don't leave the consumer wondering if the last shipment from china was powdered down and added with filler? what real testing does a sup company do when they are selling a product that isn't for human consumption?


this may break a forum rule, dunno.

google eroids

problem solved
 
this may break a forum rule, dunno.

google eroids

problem solved

ehh- this list is only valid if and only if all of the sellers are subscribed to that website.
secondly, people have to register this site to in order to give a review.
third, this site gives a company who gets railed on numerous forums and gets neg reviews when searching google a fake chance to shine.

if someone goes directly to this site and sees a company ranked high they could be in for a real ride. they may not realize that other companies didn't sign up for this site (score given to those not in participation produces a zero) they will see a high rating based on the small amount of participation thus giving an altered advantage.

its a good concept, but its flawed.
 
ehh- this list is only valid if and only if all of the sellers are subscribed to that website.
secondly, people have to register this site to in order to give a review.
third, this site gives a company who gets railed on numerous forums and gets neg reviews when searching google a fake chance to shine.

if someone goes directly to this site and sees a company ranked high they could be in for a real ride. they may not realize that other companies didn't sign up for this site (score given to those not in participation produces a zero) they will see a high rating based on the small amount of participation thus giving an altered advantage.

its a good concept, but its flawed.

Its better than nothing though when you are trying to find a legit source and google is your only friend. How much can you really trust forum posts on who is legit or not. The same can be said about that website, however, there are a few websites that rate suppliers like that website. All you need to do is compare those websites between the rate sites and you can easily find a legit source. This concept is mentioned in 'The Manifesto of Mass - The Bodybuilding Blueprint For a Freaky Huge and lean body whilst maintaining optimum health; chapter 14,' which is a good source of information.

You have to have a goal, knowledge, and expectation of a product. I'll use myself as an example. Im no bodybuilder. Im the typically fat american who tries to be healthy but has plateaued whilst eating eating and exercising. I weigh 100kg and am 173cm.

Goal: 88kg. Nothing drastic.
Knowledge: I reviewed multiple materials related to gw50, t3, clen, lgd4033, creatine, and eca.
My expectations were minimal as I know no matter the product, if I dont control my diet and exercise then it will be wasted money.

To determine what works and what websites were legit, I used websites like eroids and the double source method. I bought the smallest possible product from two different sources. I took one product at a time (if it was clen, then only clen) for one week at a time. I compared the results and side effects to my researched knowledge. I then took the product from the second source. Compared results and from that determine which was legit and which was bunk (btw, both were the same for me) to know if my source was ok. Over a few months, I determined which products I liked taking and which ones had too much risk vs reward. I ended up only taking gw50, ECA, and creatine as my daily products. From, what many would consider an expensive method, I found two legit sources that I trust (I will not name them) that are local USA. I am no longer plateaued anymore as well and am quite pleased. The only thing that changed was taking those products.



edit: to stay on topic.

I have also compared gw50 liquid vs powdered pill

liquid gw50 gave me a ton of stamina to do cardio and made me pee a lot. It took about 30 minutes to feel its effects.
powdered gw50 gave me a ton of stamina, increased my body temp, and I did not pee as often. It took about an hour to feel its effects.

with both, my pee smelled fruity, which is a sign of ketones in the urine.

Hope this info helps.
 
Last edited:
Its better than nothing though when you are trying to find a legit source and google is your only friend. How much can you really trust forum posts on who is legit or not.

Hope this info helps.

You and ANYONE can trust these forums as long as they listen to our senior members/mods/admins/sponsors SO YES YOU CAN TRUST STEROIDOLOGY.COM FORUMS.
 
You and ANYONE can trust these forums as long as they listen to our senior members/mods/admins/sponsors SO YES YOU CAN TRUST STEROIDOLOGY.COM FORUMS.

While that may be true here, I am not a very trusting person to take the word of others. I prefer a trial and error method. :)
 
The place where I got GW (Something RUI doesn't carry.) was from a company that is still around and reputable enough. They had these products pulled and are focused on others now.

I only ask about the liquid vs pill form because I happen to mention I had pill form GW and got slammed by the masses that it was not GW and that nothing in a capsule could be. It simply wouldn't work.

Theyre pushing their line of SARMS so there's that. But I figured I'd ask here

The big issue between liquid and pill / capsule forms of SARMs is legality. Pills and capsules imply human consumption, and SARMs are not legal for human consumption, they are for animal research only. You can potentially end up with a cop at your door if you buy in pill or capsule form, but will not if you buy in liquid form (since it is legal to sell and buy in liquid form).

So while they could be legit, they are not legal, which is one of the biggest draws currently for SARMs. Take away the legality (and therefor safety) of purchasing and you might as well go full on AAS.
 
The big issue between liquid and pill / capsule forms of SARMs is legality. Pills and capsules imply human consumption, and SARMs are not legal for human consumption, they are for animal research only. You can potentially end up with a cop at your door if you buy in pill or capsule form, but will not if you buy in liquid form (since it is legal to sell and buy in liquid form).

So while they could be legit, they are not legal, which is one of the biggest draws currently for SARMs. Take away the legality (and therefor safety) of purchasing and you might as well go full on AAS.

I wanted to IM this but I cannot since this may go off topic.


Not everyone interested in SARMs wants to take AAS that uses needles. I'd imagine many vets dont care anymore, but new people who just want to bulk a little or cut bodyfat, do not all want to jab themselves every day. They would rather take a pill or oral liquid. For some, the pill is easier to use than the liquid.


If cops were that interested in arresting everyone that bought a SARMs pill, you'd hear about it on the news. Sites like eroids and such openly show people selling them. It literally takes less than five minutes to figure out where they are located and quite often their real names (I work in IT). At some point, you have to enter your real information to have a website. At some point, the cops would just follow the mail trail if you were smart enough to avoid real info on the website and track you down that way. Basically, there is always a paper trail if effort is used to find it. But they don't, because, although its against the law, its a non-existent issue to them. Only things like ephreda in the usa where companies were putting 100mg in a pill is when cops/fda decided to take action. Considering SARMs and AAS are technically illegal/banned for humans, they will not be added in large-scale product distribution to warrant action by fda or the cops. Only exceptions are when those places say they are selling gw50 pills but are adding other things in it (which is only a matter of time before people stop buying it or they are arrested).


tl;dr cops have better things to do than arrest joe for buying a SARMs pill. If anything, like with pirated software, its the supplier that would get arrested.
 
You and ANYONE can trust these forums as long as they listen to our senior members/mods/admins/sponsors SO YES YOU CAN TRUST STEROIDOLOGY.COM FORUMS.

even though hes on the couch, hes right- no senior member, mod or anyone has pushed any specific product and foremost everyone here goes further with offering assistance to those who ask. i searched around for a month before i came here and did my research and ask questions. great site
 
I wanted to IM this but I cannot since this may go off topic.


Not everyone interested in SARMs wants to take AAS that uses needles. I'd imagine many vets dont care anymore, but new people who just want to bulk a little or cut bodyfat, do not all want to jab themselves every day. They would rather take a pill or oral liquid. For some, the pill is easier to use than the liquid.


If cops were that interested in arresting everyone that bought a SARMs pill, you'd hear about it on the news. Sites like eroids and such openly show people selling them. It literally takes less than five minutes to figure out where they are located and quite often their real names (I work in IT). At some point, you have to enter your real information to have a website. At some point, the cops would just follow the mail trail if you were smart enough to avoid real info on the website and track you down that way. Basically, there is always a paper trail if effort is used to find it. But they don't, because, although its against the law, its a non-existent issue to them. Only things like ephreda in the usa where companies were putting 100mg in a pill is when cops/fda decided to take action. Considering SARMs and AAS are technically illegal/banned for humans, they will not be added in large-scale product distribution to warrant action by fda or the cops. Only exceptions are when those places say they are selling gw50 pills but are adding other things in it (which is only a matter of time before people stop buying it or they are arrested).

tl;dr cops have better things to do than arrest joe for buying a SARMs pill. If anything, like with pirated software, its the supplier that would get arrested.

You are absolutely correct. If the only reason to buy SARMs is to avoid a needle, and no concern about legality comes into play, then it would not matter if pills were used. But since liquid SARMs are legal to both sell and buy, you will find most of the more prominent SARMs sellers will only sell liquids. They simply want to avoid any chance of legal troubles. It is those who fly under the radar that have no issue with it - or sites that also sell AAS - since they are illegal already to both sell and buy (without a prescription).

It then comes down to a buyer beware - but that is always the case even with liquid only companies. I have never used any pill forms, so I cannot speak about them, but I have used SarmsSearch liquids and they are legit. At least the ones I have used are - especially the GW50, I really love that stuff.

But yeah, if legality is not a concern, then pills are an easier way to go since they do not taste nearly as bad. I would just be concerned about quality. But like I said, that is just something we need to test out for ourselves anyway.
 
I prefer pill form but as you all can see, that's pretty hard to come by now. Unless you're willing to buy raw and cap it yourself.
 
Back
Top