What is your opinion on me beginning AAS after I prove my ability to myself to gain weight with my diet and workout protocol. Is it then acceptable to use AAS to accelerate yourself to your natural peak physique? Also do you believe there are any inherent risks in running two week cycles? If not then why not give it a try? I think most of what ppl have been trying to tell me is it is not the most efficient way to cycle. So they say its a COMPLETE waste.
I'd like to tell you that you need to wait until you are at your absolute genetic potential and only then use it to push past that point, but realistically how many people actually get to their genetic potential before cycling. What I will say is this, when I first started steroids, I was using them as a crutch, not a tool. I would have a sub-par diet, didn't really know how to train etc., and would end up losing most of my progress within a few months because the AAS was making me big, not helping my diet and training make me big, if that makes any sense? The best thing I ever did for my physique is to go natural for a while and learn what different types of training to for my body, same as nutrition, and as a matter of fact I canceled my plans to cycle this year to get more in tune with my diet, because that still isn't all that great. My point here is that it isn't just about gaining weight, it is about learning how to manipulate and sculpt your body.
I commend you for trying to find as much information as possible, even if some people don't agree with it, just make sure you don't get so caught up in going against the grain that you miss out on good info from knowledgeable people. Short cycles are not a complete waste, and can be used effectively, as can long cycles. My point is that until you get every aspect of diet training and nutrition in order and know how you respond to each, it is mostly a waste, maybe not a complete waste but mostly a waste, and really aren't necessary or recommended for a beginner. Short cycles are going to have the same side effects and possible risks of longer cycles, they are not going to be any more detrimental than longer ones. I think what people are trying to say here more than calling you an idiot is that simple cycles are a VERY tried and true method, and screwing around with short cycles is just making shit way more complicated than it needs to be. By all means once you have some experience with AAS, try out some short cycles and see how it works for you but I would get some AAS experience under your belt first. For example, lets say you take a compound that you react really badly to and it keeps you from training or training at 100%, assuming you can narrow down which one is doing that and cut it out, lets say you lost a week of training, now you only have 1 more week of on cycle training. What I'm saying is it's easy to read study's or people's writing, but actually being on AAS and having personal experience with it is completely different than reading about it. And believe me there a LOT of people with a LOT more experience and more book knowledge on pretty much every aspect of this world than I do, so listen to them. I'm not saying don't keep reading and learning from different opinions but the experience a lot of these guys provide is invaluable