isolating just that part of the bicep is extremely hard . heavy weight done with control adds mass . stick to heavy basics like barbell curls and cambered curls and keep the reps in the 5-8 rangeshaggz said:i need to thicken up my arms, specifically in the upper biceps area that connects to the front delt, and touches the pecs (when big enough) WHAT KIND of biceps exercise should i concentrate on ?
i like wide grip myself but switching up is good .shaggz said:wide or narrow grip?
silver_shadow said:pullups will really get your biceps working (narrow underhand grip). having said that, what are your stats? i have yet to see a 250+ guy who didn't have big arms - the point being that trying to isolate your bicep isn't going to get it any bigger without your whole body growing. even if you gain 5lbs of muscle, the bigger muscles are going to account for most of that weight with very negligible amount settling on your arms. now gain 20-30 lbs and i can guarantee you, you will notice a big difference in your arm size.
silver_shadow said:pullups will really get your biceps working (narrow underhand grip). having said that, what are your stats? i have yet to see a 250+ guy who didn't have big arms - the point being that trying to isolate your bicep isn't going to get it any bigger without your whole body growing. even if you gain 5lbs of muscle, the bigger muscles are going to account for most of that weight with very negligible amount settling on your arms. now gain 20-30 lbs and i can guarantee you, you will notice a big difference in your arm size.
what is your target weight at the moment? genetics is a part of it, but maximizing your entire body is pretty much the only way you can maximize the lagging parts as well. i've been through this stage myself, having been at 130 lbs once and i'm now at 228 (i'm 5ft10). i had "lagging pecs and arms" myself, but nearly 100lbs of wt increase has fixed that! this is the bitter truth. just consider that there was a magic exercise to improve arms. don't you think then that every average gymrat would then work only that exercise and would sport 20" arms on 140lb geek frames? obviously it just isn't that simple.shaggz said:true. im not anywhere near that big -170lbs- (dont give me anyshit please, i dotn weigh much but im in really good shape), but there are parts of my body that just dont seem to to develop like the rest of my body. my upper biceps, and my traps/middle delts dont match the rest of my body, which is developing normally. genetics i guess. ive recently changed my diet drastically to increase my calorie intake
http://www.****************/forum/showthread.php?t=494196shaggz said:target weight is 185lbs. 15 lbs natuarlly, and then at end of year, ill run a test cycle to reward myself if i finish my goal.
when i flex, my front delt pops on nice, and so does my rear delt. my middle delt just looks like a limp bridge between them, same as my upper bicep that closes teh gap between my delt and my inner lower tricep.
im EATING about 3500-ish calls a day now(healthy diet), i plan to increase to 4500-ish calls in about a week or 2 once i get used to gradually cramming more food down my throat.
is that enough calories?
silver_shadow said:what is your target weight at the moment? genetics is a part of it, but maximizing your entire body is pretty much the only way you can maximize the lagging parts as well. i've been through this stage myself, having been at 130 lbs once and i'm now at 228 (i'm 5ft10). i had "lagging pecs and arms" myself, but nearly 100lbs of wt increase has fixed that! this is the bitter truth. just consider that there was a magic exercise to improve arms. don't you think then that every average gymrat would then work only that exercise and would sport 20" arms on 140lb geek frames? obviously it just isn't that simple.