The Truth about Sustanon ??

Then, I would try different forms of Test, before you jump totally on the Sustanon Bandwagon. You say, every one responds different, yet, you dont know how you would respond to cypionate or propionate.
 
I just started Karchi Sus 250 along w/ GH. All my friends had amzing gains from it.

What I'm doing is using Sus 250 EOD for 2-3 weeks them I'll be on ICN's for few months and then on Prop......
Personaly I would only use Sus 250 for EOD injections. But thats me.
 
RoadHouse said:
Then, I would try different forms of Test, before you jump totally on the Sustanon Bandwagon. You say, every one responds different, yet, you dont know how you would respond to cypionate or propionate.


Im the type to stick with what works. If it ever stops working then I will try something else.

Right now I am trying something else. Im at the end of a 4 weeker of prop and nandrolone phenylprop. I dropped a few %bf (down to 9-10% and gained 9lbs (just under 240 at 5`10). BUT starting in 6 weeks its Sustanon (sust) time again! :)
 
StoneColdNTO said:
There seems to be two different and distinct trains of thought concerning Sustanon on the boards these days.

The first one is; Because of the 4 different esters, you have to inject frequently (EOD) in order to maintain stable blood levels. This makes sense as you would think the prop would be the first to release and the first to clear, then the phenyleprop and so on.

The second one is; Sustanon (sust) in reality acts more like a single ester Test, providing stable blood levels from the start. This makes sense if you think of the reason it was invented, for Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) and infrequent injections, up to 3 weeks. They certainly would not want you test levels fluctuating all over the place between injections.

Let's hear your thoughts and any science to back up either theory !!

I have marked myself for death by defying those 6 or so 'authors' of, er, rather, those dudes who cut-n-pasted 'that fucking sustanon article' I hate so much. Everyone knows what article I'm taking about..

In reality, the bottom-line of the article boils down to "inject more often." This idea is nothing new and it's validity has been shown physiologically, mathematically, and in every other way.

So if the bottom-line advice is OK, why do I hate the article so much?

Because this simple idea is littered with so much illogical and outright incorrect garbage that, I assume, is "reasoning" to the original writer and apparently damn good enough for the dozen plagerists that followed.

I'm almost convinced that a guru-status writer who knows precisely how an ester works, etc wrote the article but filled it with the illogic (not to mention gramatical errors) in an effort to throw off those genuinely interested in the science..

Before when it was one bookworm and an audience of meatheads, we had pyramid dosing, sustanon binding 4 different receptors, and you name it.. Now we have book-worms and meatheads forming these hybrid species, meathead-brainiacs, and they are leading the way with science AND practical knowledge.. That sustanon dude must have feared this.. I'm calling him out.

Andy
 
All test esters start releasing test immediately into the blood stream...
Of course you'll get better results if you shoot it more frequently...
 
well the first time i used sus i gained 19lbs off it alone injecting 2 times a week for 8 weeks... i kept almost all of that as well. i love this stuff and i am about to start another cycle of it again next week. along with some d-bol as well.. so i would say #2 is my anser.
 
Back
Top