I wouldn't do transdermal. IM only
Is trenazone basically trenavarI believe absorbency is dictated by the weight of the steriod/ prohormone. I don't know all of the scientific lingo but if it has a high weight it can't work in a transdermal preparation. Or in other words your skin won't absorb it. Also oral hdrol or epistane may act quite differently injected than it does orally. Oh and I believe trenazone which is transdermal is converted to the active compound via your skin enzymes.
Is trenazone basically trenavar
I remember back when Patrick Arnold developed a transdermal prohormone he used isopropyl myristate (IPM) to enhance absorption.
Dienolone. From what I gather the old tren phs converted to this target hormone.
Being its not 17a methylated oral absorpstion would be poor. Transdermal would be gtg if you have a good carrier on hand such as the one used for test gel.Yeah I have a recipe to make my own transdermal stuff with that ingredient and seems fairly simple. So bassically would I get better absorption with transdermal or oral? The compound is Estra-4,9,11-triene-3,17-dione
Yeah this stuff actually converts to the active compound in the body so would it still convert since the liver will be skipped the first timeBeing its not 17a methylated oral absorpstion would be poor. Transdermal would be gtg if you have a good carrier on hand such as the one used for test gel.
Yeah this stuff actually converts to the active compound in the body so would it still convert since the liver will be skipped the first time
I'm not sure I understand the Q. It is not a methylated compound. Therefore a lot of it wouldn't survive liver first pass if administered orally.
Just use iron legions salvo carrier
OP I would do a little more research on this....seems like it might be what you are looking for