Tren tabs vs pellets

[Drveejay11]

Can ANYONE explain the difference???

 

[RoadHouse]

i saw that thread on elite. Sure, some tren is lost in the conversion process, but in the end, just like we say "Test is Test", Tren is Tren. I usually figure in a 15% loss of tren in the conversion, and adjust dosage accordingly.

 

[RoadHouse]

Wether it is made by an underground lab, or from pellets, they had to make the pellets out of something right? Both used the same overseas manufacturer from the land of Great Buffet Resturuants.

 

[Drveejay11]

i saw that thread on elite. Sure, some tren is lost in the conversion process, but in the end, just like we say "Test is Test", Tren is Tren. I usually figure in a 15% loss of tren in the conversion, and adjust dosage accordingly.

This one's a little different bro.....I'm referring to the tabs made by BD made specifically for ORAL use.

They are 25 mg/each and "SUPPOSEDLY" have a better absorption rate! ??? They are NOT 17-aa so I'm NOT sure what that that claim is based on.....? Bullshit perhaps???

 

[RoadHouse]

oh my bad,
I know what you are talking about, I still believe the absorbtion is probaly like 40% max.

 

[Drveejay11]

oh my bad,
I know what you are talking about, I still believe the absorbtion is probaly like 40% max.

I agree that the absorption rate SUCKS, I'd be hard-pressed to even say 25%!

I just wander how the hell it's any different ( the tabs) from the pellets......no one seems to know.

 

[Drveejay11]

Buellar??????

 

[Annonamous1]

One major difference is the price. To run a tren cycle at 75mg ed with tabs is alot more expensive. The tabs are most likely held to a higher standard for human consumption rather than the pellets which are made for cattle.

 

[Drveejay11]

I'd agree with that 100% ...... I was just wandering if anyone was directly familiar with "what" exactly (other than "cleaner" processing and use of materials) is the BIG difference???? Absorption-wise???

NO ONE seems to be able to provide merit to the fact that TABS (vs pellets) would result in better absorption!

 

[RoadHouse]

Maybe the binders on pellets, made for implanting, hinder the absorbtion, more so than the binders on the tabs, which are made for ingestion

 

[Drveejay11]

You MIGHT be onto something! Hmmmmmmmmmmm........

The binders in the pellets are made of methyl cellulose:

"This product is a synthetic chemical that loves water. It stays within the intestinal tract and is not absorbed. By attracting and holding water, it creates a softer stool. It is not a true harsh stimulant laxative which should be taken only occasionally. Methylcellulose can be taken long-term. Since it absorbs fluid, it may be helpful at times for diarrhea. It does not lower cholesterol. "

Certainly makes me wonder...........