Carpenter_Guy
Building a HOUSE!!!
great find and good read
300mg vs 600mg of testosterone
- Thread starter StoneColdNTO
- Start date
Carpenter_Guy
Building a HOUSE!!!
great find and good read
H
hulk14
Guest
I don't know where to get roids and would r want to begin I'm from Phoenix AZ. Can any one help?
Vadar
New member
i highly doubt the likelihood
back on topic tho...for my first cycle, i feel more confident now with uising 600mg of Test Enth.
Great read
thats weird right?
I wonder if they tested more men there would be that much of a difference?
I've heard of some people that cruise on 250-300mg of Test year round say that they have probs with acne....but have no problems with acne when they "blast"(run a cycle).
The acne goes away when the dosage is increased...
So I'm wondering why?
My theory...
Is it because maybe they arent running a Aromatase inhibitor (AI) and the balance between estro and Test was off balance...?Basically...Estro to high compared to the Test..)??
Then when the dosage is increased the balance shifted to Testosterone being even more dominant in the system?
interesting.I was originally gonna say I know hormonal imbalance can cause break outs.But wasent connecting the estrogen and test levels.
Last edited:
but why...?
but why..?
Its interesting how a difference of an HRT/TRT dose of testosterone and running 500mg/600mg can cause a difference in sebum,the shit that cause acne from hormones.
There has to be more variables or your right in your theory more test in the lower dose is converting to estrogen causing the imbalance.
Its interesting how a difference of an HRT/TRT dose of testosterone and running 500mg/600mg can cause a difference in sebum,the shit that cause acne from hormones.
There has to be more variables or your right in your theory more test in the lower dose is converting to estrogen causing the imbalance.
Greazy-Pickle
Senior Member
hands down the best post put on here that ive saw...
jackt
vet
also my question when reading this
any additional study regarding this topic stone??
RacerX920
New member
I would think it's because of the testing variable due to the small sample size. Only 25 total subjects were in the trial and some people are suceptible to acne and some aren't, its genetics.
60% vs. 15%....??
RacerX920
New member
Well, it depends on who did the sample size selection.
A random sample is the idea, but how can you get a good random sample of 25 people to determine the effects of a substance as it is related to 6 billion?
From what I've seen and I'm not a scientist, most controlled studies concerning humans, aren't very controlled. How do you control a person throughout their entire day, you can't. And then of course there's the issue with nature vs nurture!
A random sample is the idea, but how can you get a good random sample of 25 people to determine the effects of a substance as it is related to 6 billion?
From what I've seen and I'm not a scientist, most controlled studies concerning humans, aren't very controlled. How do you control a person throughout their entire day, you can't. And then of course there's the issue with nature vs nurture!
